[1]刘 婧.基于“代际”视角谈海外华人学者对“传统”与“现代”的两难选择——从“五四”传统说开去[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,37(06):71-77.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2018.06.012]
 LIU Jing.The Optional Dilemma between Tradition and Modernization by Overseas Chinese Scholars from the Perspectives of Intergeneration——Based on the tradition of the May Fourth Movement[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2018,37(06):71-77.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2018.06.012]
点击复制

基于“代际”视角谈海外华人学者对“传统”与“现代”的两难选择——从“五四”传统说开去()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
37
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
71-77
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2018-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Optional Dilemma between Tradition and Modernization by Overseas Chinese Scholars from the Perspectives of Intergeneration——Based on the tradition of the May Fourth Movement
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2018 )06-0071-07
作者:
刘 婧
西南大学 新诗研究所 重庆400715
Author(s):
LIU Jing
Research Institute of Modern Chinese Poetry, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
关键词:
代际 “五四”传统 海外 现代 重建
Keywords:
intergeneration the tradition of May 4th movement overseas modernity reconstruction
分类号:
I 206.7
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2018.06.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
上世纪七八十年代,海外思潮在学术界风声涌起,“五四”的历史定位及其现代性等相关问题再次成为华人学者讨论的焦点,在诸如夏氏兄弟、李欧梵、王德威等几代海外学人的共同影响之下,我们对“五四”的认识显然增添了更多域外文化的参考因素。总体来看,无论是基于思想理论层面所谓“抒情传统”、“被压抑的现代性”,抑或是实践方法上“同情之批评”、“创造性转化”等等,海外华人学者虽着眼于“五四”,但其脉络似乎更强调了“传统”作为精神源泉的“向心力”特征。这种在“远传统”与“近传统”之间来回穿梭的“边缘性话语”,恰恰反映了他们在不同历史背景与代际观念下矛盾的个体知识建构与心理文化特征。从资源、身份、师承关系等方面比较这几代学者之间的思想差异,重点探讨他们在“传统”与“现代”的纠缠之中贯穿的一个核心理念,即对“五四”精神内涵的深度挖掘与重建问题,以便更好地把握现代文学海外研究的脉络和走向。
Abstract:
With the upsurge of overseas trends of thought in the academia in seventies and eighties of last century, the issues relevant to the historical position and the modernity of May 4th movement become a focus discussed by Chinese scholars once again. Under the common influence of several generations of overseas scholars, such as Xia’s brothers, Leo Lee and David Wang, our understanding of this movement have been attached with more related factors of overseas culture. Generally when it comes to the notions of “the lyrical tradition” and “the suppressed modernity” based on the ideological theory or “the sympathetic criticism” and “the creative transformation” used in rational practice, the overseas Chinese scholars seem to think more of the tradition as the centripetal force of spiritual source, even though they keep an eye to the May 4th” movement. These marginal words shuttling back and forth between the ancient times and today reflect the inconsistent construction of scholars’ personal knowledge and the trait of their psychological culture under the different historical background and the varied intergeneration view. Comparing the ideological differences of these scholars of several generations in the aspects of resources, status, mentoring relationship and so on this article mainly discusses the core idea in their option of “tradition” and “modernity”, which is to excavate and reconstruct the spiritual connotation of May 4th movement in order to better understand the modern literature research and its developing direction abroad.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李泽厚.中国现代思想史论[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008.
[2] 钱理群.“我给他的回报,是丰富的痛苦”——钱理群的知识分子精神史[N].南方周末,2016-11-21,http://www.infzm.com/content/120923.
[3] 夏济安.夏济安选集[M]. 增订版.吉林:辽宁教育出版社,2001.
[4] 李欧梵.光明与黑暗之门——我对夏氏兄弟的敬意和感激[J].季进,杭粉华,译.当代作家评论,2007(2):10-19.
[5] 夏济安.旧文化与新小说[M]//夏济安选集(增订版).沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001.
[6] 王洞,季进.夏志清夏济安书信集:卷二(1950-1955)[M].香港:香港中文大学出版社,2015.
[7] 李欧梵.徘徊在现代与后现代之间[M].上海:三联书店,2000.
[8] 李欧梵.现代性的追求(总序)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2010.
[9] 李凤亮.彼岸的现代性——美国华人批评家访谈录[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2011.
[10] 李杨.“没有晚清,何来‘五四’”的两种读法[J].中国现代文学研究丛刊,2006(1):81-98.
[11] 王德威.抒情传统与中国现代性[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2010.
[12] 张旭东.全球化时代的文化认同:西方普遍主义话语的历史批判[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[13] 张旭东.只有五四才能帮助中国在全球化中找到方向[EB/OL].http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/148980/9231046.html,2009-05-04.
[14] 刘纳.嬗变:幸亥革命时期至“五四”时期的中国文学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]马启民.中国马克思主义知识分子代际传承研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,36(05):1.[doi:10.15986/J.1008-7192.2017.05.001]
 AStudyontheMarxistIntellectuals’IntergenerationalInheritanc[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2017,36(06):1.[doi:10.15986/J.1008-7192.2017.05.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-22
作者简介:刘 婧(1994-),女,西南大学新诗研究所硕士研究生,研究方向为现当代诗学理论。E-mail:751718629@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-15