[1]王 龙.批评话语分析视角下中英新闻评论的态度资源对比研究——基于《卫报》和《人民日报》香港暴乱评论话语分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(02):82-88.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.02.012]
　WANG Long.A Comparative Study on the Attitude Resources of Chinese and British News Commentaryfrom the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis——A discourse analysis based on Hong Kong riots reviews in The Guardian and People’s Daily[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(02):82-88.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.02.012]
点击复制

批评话语分析视角下中英新闻评论的态度资源对比研究——基于《卫报》和《人民日报》香港暴乱评论话语分析()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
82-88
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study on the Attitude Resources of Chinese and British News Commentaryfrom the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis——A discourse analysis based on Hong Kong riots reviews in The Guardian and People’s Daily
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)02-0082-07
作者:
王 龙
(兰州理工大学 外国语学院,甘肃 兰州 730050)
Author(s):
WANG Long
(School of Foreign Languages, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)
关键词:
新闻评论话语;  批评话语分析;  态度资源;  对比研究
Keywords:
news comments;  critical discourse analysis;  attitude resources;  comparative study
分类号:
G212; H314
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以中英两国具有影响力的新闻媒体《人民日报》和《卫报》在2019年6月至12月期间就香港暴乱的新闻评论话语为研究对象,基于批评话语分析理论,从态度资源系统的情感、判断以及鉴赏角度对比研究两家媒体对香港暴乱现象的态度资源分布异同,试图揭示评论背后隐藏的意识形态和政治立场。研究发现,判断资源在两报评价中占有很大比例,但在判断对象评论角度上截然不同; 语言表征方式也存在差异,《卫报》评论者多引用他人言语而《人民日报》的评价方式较单一。通过对态度资源分布的批评话语分析,揭示了西方媒体在新闻话语评论中隐含的负面意识形态,为读者正确理解新闻评论话语提供参考,并对中外报刊的阅读和写作提供借鉴。
Abstract:
The paper focuses on the news comments about the riots in Hong Kong in two influential Chinese and British media, The Guardian and People’s Daily, from June 2019 to December 2019. Based on critical discourse analysis, this paper studies the similarities and differences in the distribution of attitude resources between two medias in terms of affect, judgment and appreciation in an attempt to reveal the hidden ideology and political stance behind the comments. The result indicates that judgment takes a very large proportion in the comments of two newspapers, but two media hold different angles toward the comment target. In addition, there are differences in the language representation. The Guardian tends to cite others’ ideas while People’s Daily’s method is relatively simple. By means of critical discourse analysis on the distribution of attitude resources, this paper reveals the hidden negative ideology in the news commentary of Western media in the hope of offering some references for readers’ understanding of news comments and some insights into reading and writing for newspaper home and abroad.

参考文献/References:

[1] WODAK,R. Language’s Power and Ideology Studies in Political Discourse[M]. Amsterdam:John Benjamin,1988.
[2]FAIRCLOUGH, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical study of language [M]. London: Longman,1995.
[3]DIJK V, T A. Multidisciplinary CAD: A Plea for Diversity[M].London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2001.
[4]SCOLLON R. Mediated discourse: the Nexus of Practice [M].London: Routledge,2001.
[5]潘艳艳. 多模态话语分析中的批评特征探析[J]. 天津外国语大学学报,2018(2):78-87.
[6]MARTION J R,WHITE P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English[M].New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[7]焦俊峰. 基于态度资源的新闻话语意识形态构建与解读[J]. 西安外国语大学学报,2018(3):41-46.
[8]ELSTER J. Rationality’s emotion and social norms[J].Synthese, 1994(98):27.
[9]VAN DIJK T A. News as Discourse [M].Hisllsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1988.
[10]焦俊峰,刘美兰.英美媒体对孔子学院文化形象构建研究-基于《卫报》与《纽约时报》相关报道的批评话语分析[J]. 天津外国语大学学报,2019(4):13-23.
[11]FOWLER R. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press[M]. London: Routledge, 1991.
[12]李庆明,吴华. 费氏三维分析模型视角下英语新闻语篇的批评话语分析——以《纽约时报》官方网站关于中国反腐报道为例[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2019(3):126-132.
[13]FOWLER R. Linguistic Criticisim[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 12- 25基金项目:甘肃省“十三五”教育科学2018年规划课题(GS [2018]GHBBK158); 兰州理工大学2016年度科研发展基金项目(16-061602)作者简介:王 龙(1982-),男,兰州理工大学外国语学院大学英语教学二部讲师,硕士,研究方向为语用学与话语分析。E-mail:sisuwang@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-25