[1]焦 琰,邓春媛,刘 莉.利益分析视阈下环评制度的反思与修正[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,35(01):42-48.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.01.008]
　JIAO Yan,DENG Chun-yuan,LIU Li.The Rethinking and the Amendment of the Environmental Impact Assessment System in the Light of the Interests Analysis Theory[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2016,35(01):42-48.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.01.008]
点击复制

利益分析视阈下环评制度的反思与修正()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
35
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
42-48
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2016-03-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Rethinking and the Amendment of the Environmental Impact Assessment System in the Light of the Interests Analysis Theory
文章编号:
1008-7192(2016)01-0042-07
作者:
焦 琰；邓春媛；刘 莉
西安建筑科技大学 文学院，陕西 西安 710055
Author(s):
JIAO Yan;  DENG Chun-yuan;  LIU Li
School of Literature,Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech.,Xi’an710055,China
关键词:
利益分析理论; 环评制度; 反思; 修正
Keywords:
the interest analysis theory;  the environmental impact assessment system;  rethinking;  amendment
分类号:
D 912.6
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.01.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
环评中存在众多繁杂利益纠葛的困扰，由此衍生了“唯经济论”和“唯环境论”两种理念范式。从利益分析理论看，“二唯论”是极端化利益衡量的产物必须予以摒弃，取而代之的是应先按性质将环境利益区分为基本环境利益和一般环境利益，对前者则采用“利益衡平”思路并通过环评相关制度的设计来保障；对后者则采用“利益衡量+利益衡平”思路并注重衡量方法和衡平手段的灵活选用；并考虑经济利益在不同地域中的权重值变化。
Abstract:
The complex interest disputes haunting in the conventional environmental impact assessment lead to the derivation of two philosophy paradigms, that is, the economism or the environmentalism. However, according to the interest analysis theory, both thoughts are the product of extreme interest measurement, which should be abandoned. Instead, the environmental interests should be divided into the basic environmental interests and the general environment interests on the basis of their nature.The former is supposed to adopt the idea of interest equity to design a relevant environment impact assessment system for guarantee, while the latter takes the idea of "interest measure plus interests equity” to lay emphasis on the flexible choice of measure method and equity means. Besides, consideration should be take to the value weight changes of the economic interests in different areas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 董正爱. 社会转型发展中生态秩序的法律构造——基于利益博弈与工具理性的结构分析与反思[J]. 法学评论,2012 (5):33-38.
[2] 杜健勋. 环境利益分配法理研究[M]. 北京:中国环境出版社,2013:41.
[3] 张文显. 二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社,1996:592.
[4] 周伟. 宪法基本权利[M]. 北京：法律出版社, 2006: 92.
[5] 陈林林. 裁判的进路与方法[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007:182.
[6] 梁上上. 利益衡量论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2013:1.
[7] 何勤华. 西方法律思想史[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2005:255.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期：2015-08-11
基金项目：陕西省哲学社会科学基金项目“陕西渭河水生态整体化治理的法制模式研究”（12E032）阶段成果
作者简介：焦 琰（1990-），男，西安建筑科技大学环境与资源保护法学硕士研究生，研究方向为环境资源法学；邓春媛（1992-），女，西安建筑科技大学环境与资源保护法学硕士研究生，研究方向为环境资源法学。E-mail:jiaoyan0910@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-09