[1]张学广.美国新维特根斯坦研究探析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,36(01):27-32.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.01.006]
　ZHANG Xue guang.An Analysis on the New American Wittgensteins[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2017,36(01):27-32.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.01.006]
点击复制

美国新维特根斯坦研究探析()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
36
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
27-32
栏目:
哲学与社会
出版日期:
2017-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Analysis on the New American Wittgensteins
文章编号:
1008-7192(2017 )01-0027-06
作者:
张学广
西安邮电大学 人文社科学院，陕西 西安 710121
Author(s):
ZHANG Xueguang
School of Humanity and Social Sciences, Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an 710121，China
关键词:
维特根斯坦哲学; 标准解释; 美国新维特根斯坦
Keywords:
Wittgenstein philosophy;  standard interpretation;  New American Wittgenstein
分类号:
B 08
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.01.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
到20世纪80年代为止，维特根斯坦哲学形成以安斯康姆和汉克尔为代表颇具倾向性的标准解释。但是此前零星存在因而被忽视的不同解释汇聚壮大而终于形成以美国学者为主的颠覆性趋向“美国新维特根斯坦”。它以“治疗性解释”、“果断解读”、“非正统解释”、“单一维特根斯坦主义”为标志，主要代表人物戴蒙德和考南特不仅果断地解读《逻辑哲学论》的“无意义”，而且充分论证维特根斯坦前后期哲学的连续性，将整个维特根斯坦哲学看作连贯的治疗性哲学。具有重大突破意义的这一解释转向引起维特根斯坦哲学解释的巨大争议，掀起国际维特根斯坦哲学研究的新潮。
Abstract:
Until 1980s the international Wittgenstein scholarship had formed a disposition of standard interpretation with G. E. M. Anscombe and P. Hacker as its representatives. However, some different interpretations, which were formerly scatted and ignored, had ultimately converged and grown mainly by American scholars, hence a subversive approach named the New American Wittgenstein. The trend was dominated by the ideas of “therapeutic interpretation”, “resolute interpretation”, “nonorthodoxy interpretation”, and “monoWittgensteinianism”. Cora Diamond and James Conant, its two representatives, criticize the conception of nonsense in the Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus, argue for the deep connection of “early” and “late” Wittgenstein and identify the Wittgenstein philosophy as a continuous therapeutic approach to the philosophy. This interpretative turn, without doubt, makes a great breakthrough in the international Wittgenstein scholarship and initiatives a new wave of Wittgenstein philosophy research worldwide since then.

参考文献/References:

[1]BILETZKI A. (Over) Interpreting Wittgenstein[M]. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
[2]路德维希·维特根斯坦. 维特根斯坦全集：第1卷[M]. 陈启伟,译. 石家庄：河北教育出版社，2003.
[3]ANSCOMBE G E M. An introduction to Wittgenstein’s tractatus[M]. London: Hutchinson and Co. Ltd, 1963.
[4]STRAWSON P F. Critical notice of Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations[J]. Mind, 1954(63): 70-99.
[5]MALCOLM N. Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations[J]. Philosophical Review, 1954, 63(4): 530-559.
[6]ISHIGURO H. Use and reference of names[M]// WINCH P. ed. Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.
[7]维特根斯坦. 哲学研究[M]. 陈嘉映,译. 上海：上海人民出版社，2001.
[8]CRARY A，READ R，eds. The new Wittgenstein[M]. London: Routledge, 2000.
[9]CRARY A, ed. Wittgenstein and the moral life: essays in honor of cora diamond[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.
[10]KBEL M,WEISS B, eds. Wittgenstein’s lasting significance[M]. London: Routledge, 2004.
[11]MCGINN M. Between metaphysics and nonsense: elucidation in Wittgenstein’s tractatus[J]. Philosophical Quarterly, 1999 (49): 491-513.
[12]HUTTO D D. Wittgenstein and the end of philosophy: neither theory nor therapy[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
[13]ATKINSON J R. The mystical in Wittgenstein’s early writings[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 2009.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-12-26
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“维特根斯坦哲学解释史研究”（15XZX011）；教育部哲学社会科学后期资助项目“《维特根斯坦剑桥书信集：1911—1951》翻译”（16JHQ018）
作者简介:张学广（1964-），男，西安邮电大学人文社科学院教授，博士，美国加州大学伯克利分校访问学者，研究方向为英美分析哲学。E-mail: zxg@xupt.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-15