[1]胡啟斌.论马克思对李嘉图劳动价值论的超越——从商品价值量与商品价值本质来看[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,38(01):8-13.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.01.002 ]
　HU Qi-bin.On Marx's Theory beyond Ricardo's Labor Theory of Value——From the perspective of the quantity and quality of commodity value[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2019,38(01):8-13.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.01.002 ]
点击复制

论马克思对李嘉图劳动价值论的超越——从商品价值量与商品价值本质来看()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
8-13
栏目:
马克思主义与思想政治教育
出版日期:
2019-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Marx's Theory beyond Ricardo's Labor Theory of Value——From the perspective of the quantity and quality of commodity value
作者:
胡啟斌
(安徽师范大学 马克思主义学院,安徽 芜湖 241000)
Author(s):
HU Qi-bin
(School of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China)
关键词:
李嘉图;  马克思;  商品价值量;  商品价值本质
Keywords:
Ricardo;  Marx;  commodity value;  the quantity of commodity value;  the quality of commodity value
分类号:
F014.2
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.01.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在马克思看来,李嘉图所处的资本主义时期的生产方式尚未成熟,资本主义经济关系仍被视作为一种永恒、自然的形式,资本主义生产条件下的商品价值量与商品价值本质之间的矛盾亦尚未得到合理解决。主要归结为:其一,李嘉图站在资本主义阶级的立场去理解劳动价值论,并将其单纯划为自然范畴。其二,李嘉图未能细分商品质的需要以满足人的需要为条件,以及没有强调人的生命价值。其三,李嘉图没有很好的厘清抽象劳动概念甚至忽视了抽象劳动。马克思创立了科学的劳动二重性理论,确立了劳动者的主体性地位,明确了价值实体概念及价值规律,并着重研究商品价值形式中质的规定性,这是对李嘉图的劳动价值论的超越。
Abstract:
In Marx's view, the mode of production in the capitalist period that Ricardo was in is not yet mature, for the capitalist economic relations were still taken then as an eternal and natural form and there was no reasonable resolution to the contradiction between the quantity and quality of commodity value under the capitalist production conditions. In short, Ricardo stands in the position of the capitalist class to understand the theory of labor value thus classifying it as a natural category. Secondly, Ricardo fails to subdivide the demand of the commodity quality to meet the needs of the people and lays less stress on the value of human life. Thirdly, Ricardo does not clarify the concept of abstract labor and even neglect the abstract labor. Theorizing the two-fold character of labor scientifically, Marx establishes the subjective status of laborers, explicits the substance of value and the law of value, and focuses on the study of the qualitative character of commodity value, which is beyond Ricardo's labor theory of value.

参考文献/References:

[1] 伊恩·斯蒂曼德,保罗·斯威齐.价值问题的论战[M].北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[2] 蔡继明,李亚鹏.劳动异质性与价值[J].经济学动态,2011(4):50-55.
[3] 鲁品越.马克思劳动价值论是与旧劳动价值论根本对立的理论[J].创新,2016(1):16-22.
[4] 刘钊.《资本论》中马克思对李嘉图经济学的全面审视及其哲学意义——兼论马恩为何是旧劳动价值论的反对者[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2016(5):68-74.
[5] 唐正东.马克思劳动价值论的双重维度及其哲学意义[J].山东社会科学,2017(5):5-10.
[6] 张雷声.马克思劳动价值论的逻辑整体性[J].教学与研究,2018(4):5-11.
[7] 马克思.资本论:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[8] 大卫·李嘉图.政治经济学及赋税原理[M]. 郭大力,王亚南,译.南京:译林出版社,2014.
[9] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第46卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1980.
[10] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第19卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1963.

相似文献/References:

[1]和建伟.从“骄傲的英国自耕农”到“农业短工”——马克思关注莎士比亚的一个视角[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,37(05):80.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2018.05.012 ]
　HE Jian-wei.From “the Proud Yeomanry of England” to “the Agricultural Laborers”——A perspective from which Marx pays attention to Shakespeare[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2018,37(01):80.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2018.05.012 ]
[2]刘允秀,夏庆波.数字资本主义视域下马克思劳资关系理论的当代价值研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,41(03):23.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.03.004]
　LIU Yun-xiu,XIA Qing-Bo.A Research on the Contemporary Value of Marx's Theory of Labor-Capital Relations from the Perspective of Digital Capitalism[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2022,41(01):23.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.03.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-11-29
作者简介:胡啟斌(1992-),男,安徽师范大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生,研究方向为马克思主义政治经济学。E-mail:895251306@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-20