[1]赵静竹.论西安地铁与香港地铁公共艺术建构的对比[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,36(02):80-86.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.02.014]
　ZHAO Jing-zhu.The Comparison Study between the Metro Public Art in Xi’an and Hong Kong[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2017,36(02):80-86.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.02.014]
点击复制

论西安地铁与香港地铁公共艺术建构的对比()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
36
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
80-86
栏目:
建筑文化
出版日期:
2017-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Comparison Study between the Metro Public Art in Xi’an and Hong Kong
文章编号:
1008-7192(2017)02-0080-07
作者:
赵静竹
?（西安建筑科技大学 艺术学院，陕西 西安 710055）
Author(s):
??ZHAO Jing-zhu
（College of Arts, Xi’an Univ. of Arch. & Tech., Xi’an 710055, China）
关键词:
西安地铁; 香港地铁; 历史发展; 文化传统; 地域特色
Keywords:
Xi’an Metro;  Hong Kong Metro;  historical development;  cultural tradition;  geographical feature
分类号:
TU-85
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.02.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地铁作为便捷的城市公共交通工具,在人们的工作生活中占有十分重要的地位。随着城市地铁的发展，地铁艺术成为城市历史文化的重要宣传平台。西安作为世界历史名城，文化底蕴深厚，地处关中平原，具有特色鲜明的关中地域文化，在地铁建设方面，西安是中国大陆第十个开通地铁的城市，目前仍有多条线路处于建设之中。而香港作为全球金融中心，地处中国南海沿岸，曾被英国殖民100余年，长期的殖民历史形成了香港独特的中西文化特色，在地铁建设方面，香港早于西安30余年，在地铁线路的建设上更加全面和成熟。通过对比分析，西安地铁与香港地铁的公共艺术建构有诸多不同，本文依据两地地铁艺术作品的主题、内容以及设计理念，将其分别分为历史发展、文化传统以及地域特色三个方面，并针对每个方面选出个别案例进行赏析，进而从整体上对作品形式、材料及设置位置进行总结对比，从而对西安地铁艺术作品的设计提供更多思路。
Abstract:
As a public transport vehicle, the metro plays a vital role in our daily life. With the development of the metro construction, more and more artworks are set in to decorate the underground space, so as to make the metro a perfect platform to show the history and culture of the city., As a world-famous city for its long history and rich cultural recourses, Xi’an is located in Guanzhong plain which bears distinctive cultural features of this region. As for the metro construction, Xi’an is the tenth city to open the metro system and most of its metro lines are still under construction. In contrast, Hong Kong is located as a center of global finance in the coast of the south sea of China. It has been colonized for more than 100 years by UK. And so its colonial history forms a blend of Chinese and Western culture. The metro construction of Hong Kong, 30 years earlier than Xi’an’s, is more comprehensive and mature. The comparative study shows there are many differences in the creation of metro public art creation between Xi’an and Hong Kong. From the aspects of subject, content and design ideas, the paper classifies the metro art works in both cities into three categories, namely, the historical development, the cultural tradition and the geographical features. With the appreciation of individual cases and the overall comparison of the form, the material and the set position of these art works, the paper aims to provide references for the design of the metro public arts in Xi’an.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-19