[1]吴运法,靳 昕,王敉敉.城市弱势建筑修补策略研究——以郑州唐子巷街区设计为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(04):27-34.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.005]
　WU Yun-fa,JIN Xin,WANG Mi-mi.A Research on Urban Repair Strategy of Disadvantaged Buildings ——In the case of the districts design of Tangzi Lane in Zhengzhou[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(04):27-34.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.005]
点击复制

城市弱势建筑修补策略研究——以郑州唐子巷街区设计为例()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
27-34
栏目:
建筑文化
出版日期:
2020-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Research on Urban Repair Strategy of Disadvantaged Buildings ——In the case of the districts design of Tangzi Lane in Zhengzhou
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)04-0027-08
作者:
吴运法; 靳 昕; 王敉敉
(安徽建筑大学 建筑与规划学院,安徽 合肥 230022)
Author(s):
WU Yun-fa; JIN Xin; WANG Mi-mi
(School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei 230022, China)
关键词:
历史街区;  弱势建筑;  城市修补;  唐子巷
Keywords:
historic district;  disadvantaged buildings;  urban repair;  Tangzi Lane
分类号:
TU 201.1
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
存量规划时代, “城市修补”已经成为历史街区空间改造、城市空间激活重塑、促进城市复兴的新方法。透过弱势建筑视角,解析面临被迫“记忆删除”的历史街区与弱势建筑之间的语义关联,进一步以郑州唐子巷历史街区为例,梳理当前空间状况,剖析其优势与弱势,针对物质空间品质下降、原有功能逐渐衰退、活力丧失、弱势人群生存与生活的困境,提出空间微创、网络整合、多元活化、多方参与四大策略,根据弱势问题有针对性地妥善处理弱势建筑,组织城市空间,关怀弱势群体,达到人居环境质量提升与人文修补的目的,提升城市空间品质,借由弱势建筑概念为此类历史街区的更新与保护提供一定的借鉴和参考。
Abstract:
In the era of stock planning, “Urban Repair” has become a new way to renovate the historical districts, activate the remodeling of urban space, and promote the urban renewal. From the perspective of disadvantaged architecture, this article analyzes the semantic association between the historical districts faced with memory deletion and the disadvantaged buildings. Taking the historical street of Tangzi Lane in Zhengzhou as an example, this paper sorts out the current spatial situation and analyzes its advantages and disadvantages. In view of the quality losses of material space, the gradual declination of original function, the vitality deprivation, and the living dilemma of weak group, four strategies are proposed like spatial micro-creation, Online integration, multiple activation, and multiple participation.Targeting the problem,the paper proposes to handle the disadvantaged buildings, re-organize the urban space, and care for weak groups to improve the qualityof human settlements, humanistic repair and urban space, and provide reference for the renewal and protection of such historical districtsof disadvantaged architecture.

参考文献/References:

[1] 佚名.高层声音[J].小城镇建设,2017(5):5.
[2]徐晓曦.“城市修补”理念下特色小城镇旅游适应性更新研究[D].南京:东南大学, 2016.
[3]常青.城市修补与设计挑战[N]. 建筑时报,2016-07-04(06).
[4]张松.顺应城市“肌理”打“补丁”[J].中华建设,2017(6):12-13.
[5]夏征农,陈至立.辞海[Z].上海:上海辞书出版社,2010.
[6]朱文一.城市弱势建筑学纲要[J].建筑学报,2013(11):8-13.
[7]周林.城市环境中弱势空间的再生设计研究[J].社会科学家,2015(8):36-40.
[8]张晓阳,王世福,费彦.可实施的“微改造”——历史街区的活化提升策略探讨[J].南方建筑,2017(5):56-60.
[9]伍婧萱.历史街区再生中的“城市针灸”策略初探[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴浪,潘永刚.将城市的记忆融入现代城市生活——论伊宁六星街历史街区的保护与发展策略 [J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,31(01):54.
　WU Lang,PAN Yong-gang. Retaining the City Memory in Modern Urban Life——Strategies to preserve and develop Liu Xin Jie historic district in Yining[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2012,31(04):54.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020- 02- 20
基金项目:安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目“徽派建筑的文化内涵研究”(SK2015A002)
作者简介:吴运法(1972-),男,安徽建筑大学建筑与规划学院安徽省城镇化协同创新中心教授,研究方向为建筑设计及其理论和城市设计; 靳 昕(1993-),女,安徽建筑大学建筑与规划学院硕士研究生,研究方向为建筑设计及其理论。E-mail:842240792@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-10