[1]代剑磊.论汉长安城、都、县的地理空间[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,40(01):17-25.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.01.003]
 DAI Jian-lei.On the Geographical Space of Chang’an as a City, a Capital and a County in the Han Dynasty[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2021,40(01):17-25.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.01.003]
点击复制

论汉长安城、都、县的地理空间()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
17-25
栏目:
建筑文化
出版日期:
2021-03-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Geographical Space of Chang’an as a City, a Capital and a County in the Han Dynasty
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2021)01-0017-09
作者:
代剑磊
(首都师范大学 历史学院,北京 100089)
Author(s):
DAI Jian-lei
(School of History, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China)
关键词:
汉长安城 都城 汉长安县 时空结构
Keywords:
Chang’an City in the Han Dynasty capital Chang’an County in the Han Dynasty space-time structure
分类号:
K928; TU092
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.01.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
汉长安,本身蕴含城、都、县的三层地理概念,三者相互联系且各自发展。汉五年,都城选址与置县完成,出现汉长安县、都长安的地理概念。汉五年至七年,长安县与新城县并立,后复至秦咸阳县范围。惠帝五年,当城墙闭合后,汉长安城的空间范围被固定下来。长安城因“都”的政治特性成为三辅与长安县的共同治所,县域面积受其影响,不断减少。惠帝至新莽时期,建章宫、城南建筑与中轴线的突显,体现不同时期都城空间与制度文化的演变。东汉长安城存续,“都”的性质丧失致使城市本身的政治职能程度下降,三辅各治其城,长安县也恢复至地跨渭河南北的地域形态。
Abstract:
Chang’an in the Han dynasty contains three geographical concepts of city, capital and county, which interrelate with each other but develop respectively. The geographical concept of Chang’an as a county and a capital stems from the site selection of capital and the establishment of county in the fifth year of the Han Dynasty. From the fifth year to the seventh year of Han Dynasty Chang’an County incorporated with Xingcheng County and covered the range of Xianyang County of the Qing Dynasty. After the enclosure of city wall in the fifth year of Emperor Hui, the space scope of Chang’an City was fixed. Due to its political characteristics as a “capital”, Chang’an City was under the joint jurisdiction of Sanfu(the capital area and environs governed by three officials)and Chang’an County as well, hence the reduction of county area. During the period from Emperor Hui to Wang Mang, the conspicuous architecture such as Jianzhang Palace, buildings in the south of the city and the urban central axis reflected the evolution of the space of capital city and the institutional culture in different periods. Though Chang’an City survived in the Eastern Han Dynasty the loss of the “capital” nature led to the decline of the city’s political functions and thus Sanfu officials administrated their territories respectively. As a result, the location area of Chang’an County was narrowed down to the north and south of Weihe River.

参考文献/References:

[1]班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[2]程大昌.雍录[M].黄永年,点校.北京:中华书局,2002.
[3]乐史.太平寰宇记[M].王文楚,点校.北京:中华书局,2008.
[4]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,2014.
[5]刘庆柱.关中记[M].西安:三秦出版社,2006.
[6]何清谷.三辅黄图校释[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[7]中国社会科学院考古研究所.汉长安武库[M].北京:文物出版社,2005.
[8]宋敏求.长安志[M].辛德勇,郎潔,点校.西安:三秦出版社,2013.
[9]池田雄一.中国古代的聚落与地方行政[M].郑威,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2017.
[10]刘歆.西京杂记[M].王根林,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2012.
[11]郦道元.水经注校证[M].陈桥驿,校注.北京:中华书局,2007.
[12]梁玉绳.史记志疑[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[13]泷川资言.史记会注考证[M].北京:文学古籍刊行社,1955.
[14]王叔珉.史记斠证[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[15]葛剑雄.西汉人口地理[M].北京:人民出版社,1982.
[16]朱红林.张家山汉简《二年律令》集释[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[17]杨宽.中国古代都城制度史研究[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2017.
[18]马正林. 汉长安城总体布局的地理特征[J].陕西师范大学学报(社会科学版),1994(4):60-66.
[19]韩国河.汉长安城规划思想辨析[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(5):61-65.
[20]徐龙国.汉长安城城墙夯筑技术的观察与认识[J].考古学集刊,2010(2):356-371.
[21]张建锋.汉长安城城墙高度初探[C]//汉长安城考古与汉文化——纪念汉长安城考古五十周年国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2008.
[22]中国社会科学院考古研究所汉长安城工作队.西安市汉长安城城墙西南角遗址的钻探与试掘[J].考古,2006(10):40-52.
[23]杨东晨.秦地文化:汉都长安与秦都咸阳的关系[J].西安财经学院学报,2009(2):110-115.
[24]董鸿闻,刘起鹤.汉长安城遗址测绘研究获得的新信息[J].考古与文物,2000(5):39-49.
[25]中国社会科学院考古研究所.汉长安城未央宫——1980-1989年考古挖掘报告[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
[26]赵岐. 三辅决录[M]. 张澍,辑.陈晓捷,注.西安:三秦出版社,2006.
[27]唐晓峰.君权演替与汉长安城文化景观[J].城市与区域规划研究,2011(3):17-29.
[28]刘庆柱,李毓芳,刘连喜.汉长安城北宫的勘探及其南面砖瓦窑的发掘[J].考古,1996(10):23-32.
[29]田天.秦汉国家祭祀史稿[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015.
[30]代剑磊.秦汉关中地区城市地理研究[D].西安:西北大学,2017.
[31]刘庆柱.三秦记[M].西安:三秦出版社,2006.
[32]陈桥驿,史念海,辛德勇.中国七大古都[M].北京:中国青年出版社,1991.
[33]李令福.论秦都咸阳的城郊范围[J].中国历史地理论丛,2002(2):76-83.
[34]王学理.秦都咸阳[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1978.
[35]李泰.括地志[M].贺次君,辑校.北京:中华书局,1980.
[36]范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[37]刘瑞.秦末汉初雍王之都废丘究竟在何处[J].文物鉴定与鉴赏,2019(2):75.
[38]杜佑.通典[M].王永兴,等,点校.北京:中华书局,1998.
[39]孙星衍,等辑.汉官六种[M].周天游,点校.北京:中华书局,1990.
[40]代剑磊.论两汉弘农郡界调整与区域控制的转变[J].三门峡职业技术学院学报,2016(3):16-21.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-06-07
作者简介:代剑磊(1991-),男,首都师范大学历史学院博士研究生,研究方向为城市与区域历史地理。E-mail: shaoyujianlei@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-02