[1]翁 强,朱鸣谦.优士丁尼《法学阶梯》中胎儿的民事主体地位研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(01):39-44,49.
 Weng Qiang,Zhu Ming-qian. The Research of Fetus’ Civil Subject in Justinian’s Institutes[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2014,33(01):39-44,49.
点击复制

优士丁尼《法学阶梯》中胎儿的民事主体地位研究()
分享到:

西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
33
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
39-44,49
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2014-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Research of Fetus’ Civil Subject in Justinian’s Institutes
文章编号:
1008-7192(2014)01-0039-07
作者:
翁 强朱鸣谦
(南京财经大学法学院,江苏 南京 210023)
Author(s):
Weng QiangZhu Ming-qian
 (Nanjing university of finance and economics, Nanjing 210023, China )
关键词:
《法学阶梯》 文本评注胎儿民事主体
Keywords:
Justinian’s Institutes Exegesis Fetus Civil Subject
分类号:
D912.7
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 胎儿的民事主体地位是近年来我国学界研究的热点,实际上,古罗马时期,优士丁尼《法学阶梯》在对胎儿权益保护的立法过程中就已经涉及到胎儿的民事主体地位问题,并开创了列举保护主义的立法模式,使胎儿在若干民事权利上已享有民事主体地位,这要远远早于《德国民法典》。在我国,《中华人民共和国继承法》(以下简称《继承法》)中针对胎儿规定的继承权不能够充分保护胎儿的继承权,为此,需要考虑借鉴优士丁尼《法学阶梯》中对胎儿继承权的立法模式。
Abstract:
Fetus’ civil subject is the hotspot of academic research in China in recent years. In fact, in ancient Rome, Justinian’s Institutes’ legislation of fetus rights’ protection had been involved in the fetus’ civil subject, and created a list protectionist legislation mode. It made the fetus have enjoyed civil main body status in certain civil rights, and it is far earlier than Germany civil code. In the inheritance law of our country, the provisions for fetus is not able to fully protect the fetus’ inheritance rights, therefore we need to consider learning Justinian’s Institutes’ legislation of fetus’ inheritance rights.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-10-08
作者简介:翁  强(1988-),男,江苏新沂人#南京财经大学法学院民商法学硕士研究生,研究方向为民法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-07-30