[1]刘云飞,王有强.我国环境公益诉讼原告主体再论[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,34(05):60-64.[doi:DOI：10.15986/j.1008-7192.2015.05.015]
　Liu Yun-fei,Wang You-qiang.The Plaintiff Body of China’s Environmental Public Interest Litigation Re-discussed[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2015,34(05):60-64.[doi:DOI：10.15986/j.1008-7192.2015.05.015]
点击复制

我国环境公益诉讼原告主体再论()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
34
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
60-64
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Plaintiff Body of China’s Environmental Public Interest Litigation Re-discussed
文章编号:
1008-7192(2015)05-0070-05
作者:
刘云飞; 王有强
（西北农林科技大学 人文社会发展学院，陕西 杨凌 712100）
Author(s):
Liu Yun-fei ;  Wang You-qiang
(College of Humanities and Social Development, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China)
关键词:
原告主体; 法定诉讼担当; 环保社会组织; 检察机关; 环保行政机关
Keywords:
plaintiff body;  legal litigation take-on;  environmental social organizations;  prosecutors;  environmental executives
分类号:
TU 86
DOI:
DOI：10.15986/j.1008-7192.2015.05.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
新民诉法、新环保法和最高院《关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释》相继施行，环境公益诉讼在我国进入到了新的发展阶段，关于环境公益诉讼的原告主体进步与问题并存。对于环境公益诉讼原告主体资格取得的理论基础，运用法定诉讼担当理论可以得到合理的解释。正是由于原告主体资格的获得是基于法律的授权，所以近两年来法律的不断变化才对我国环境公益诉讼原告主体乃至整个环境公益诉讼制度的发展产生了重大的影响。现有法律应当进一步放宽环保社会组织参与环境公益诉讼的条件，同时明确赋予检察机关和环保行政机关提起环境公益诉讼的权利，并对相关程序性问题进行明确规定。
Abstract:
With the implementation of new Civil Procedure, new environmental law and the Supreme Court “ the issues of interpretation on the trial of civil public interest litigation environment applicable to” , environmental public interest litigation in China has entered into a new stage of development, progress and problems on the plaintiff body of environmental public interest litigation coexist. Theoretical basis for obtaining the qualification of the environmental public interest litigation plaintiff, using legal litigation take on can serve as a reasonable explanation. It is precisely because the plaintiff to obtain the qualification is authorized by law, the changing of laws has had a major impact on the development of the environmental public interest litigation plaintiff and even the entire system recent years. The existing laws should further expand the conditions of environmental social organizations to participate in environmental public interest litigation, while clearly giving prosecutors and environmental executives the right of filing environmental public interest litigation. And the law should clearly define the procedural issues.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李阳. 吕忠梅代表呼吁环境公益诉讼亟待制度保障[N]. 人民法院报,2015-03-14(6). [2] 田平安. 民事诉讼法学[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008:119. [3] 詹思敏,辜恩臻. 我国环境公益诉讼原告主体资格再探析[J]. 中山大学法律评论,2011(9):261-275. [4] 张晓薇. 民事诉权正当性与诉权滥用规制研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2014:171. [5] 骆永家. 既判力研究[M]. 台北:三民书局出版社,1991:139. [6] 吕忠梅. 环境公益诉讼:想说爱你不容易[J]. 中国审判,2012(10):21-23. [7]新修订的环保法开闸环境公益诉讼[EB/OL].(2015-03-10). http://www.chinairn.com/print/3579781.html. 2014-04-25. [8] 邢世伟,金煜. 最高法就环境公益诉讼出台司法解释[N]. 新京报,2015-01-07(6). [9] 王彬辉. 新《环境保护法》“公众参与”条款有效实施的路径选择:以加拿大经验为借鉴[J]. 法商研究,2014(4): 153-160. [10] 周斌. 检察院应获直接提起公益诉讼权利[N]. 法制日报,2015-03-14(8). [11] 杨光普. 对检察机关参与公益诉讼的思考[J]. 湖北社会科学,2014(5):143-147.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-05-21 基金项目：安徽省高校人文社会科学研究基地项目（SK2015A099) 作者简介：江保锋（1980-），男，安徽芜湖职业技术学院艺术传媒学院讲师，硕士，研究方向为设计艺术学及绘画。E-mail: jbf07@sohu.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-11-10