[1]陈汉辉.入社动因、合作社治理与合作社绩效关系[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,35(05):36-42.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.05.007]
　CHEN Han-hui.A Study on the Relation among the Motivation to Join Cooperatives, the Cooperative Governance and the Cooperative Performance[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2016,35(05):36-42.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.05.007]
点击复制

入社动因、合作社治理与合作社绩效关系()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
35
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
36-42
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2016-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Relation among the Motivation to Join Cooperatives, the Cooperative Governance and the Cooperative Performance
文章编号:
1008-7192(2016)05-0036-07
作者:
陈汉辉
安徽财经大学 工商管理学院，安徽 蚌埠 233030
Author(s):
 CHEN Han-hui
School of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 233030, China
关键词:
入社动因; 合作社治理; 合作社绩效
Keywords:
motivation to join cooperatives;  cooperative governance;  cooperative performance
分类号:
F 321.42
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.05.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
农民专业合作社治理属于不完全契约，参与主体、内部制度安排及外部环境都会对合作社绩效产生影响。在回顾相关研究文献基础上，首先构建“农户入社动因—合作社治理—合作社绩效”三者关系模型并提出研究假设。其次基于安徽地区289份农户调查问卷数据，实证检验三者关系机理，研究结论表明：（1）农户入社动因中直接效用因子显著正向影响合作社治理的同时，对合作社绩效亦呈显著正向影响，但是抑制效用因子与两者关系并不显著；（2）合作社治理显著正向影响合作社绩效，良好的合作社治理结构与机制能够促进合作社经营绩效的提升；（3）合作社治理在农户入社动因与合作社绩效关系中并不起中介变量作用。最后对促进农民专业合作社构建及成长提出对策建议。
Abstract:
Since the governance of farmer specialized cooperatives belongs to a category of incomplete contract, the performance of the cooperative is influenced by kinds of participators, internal system arrangement and external environment. Based on the relevant literature reviews, this paper constructs a triadic relation model of the famers’ motivation to join cooperatives, the cooperative governance and the cooperative performance, thus putting forward the research hypotheses. Analyzing empirically the triadic relation by means of a questionnaire of 289 peasant households in Anhui, the paper comes up with the conclusions: (1) the direct utility factor of the farmers’ motivation to join cooperatives positively influences either the cooperative governance or the cooperative performance, but the restraining utility factor has little to do with both of them; (2) the cooperative governance has obviously the positive influence on the cooperative performance so that a good cooperative governance structure and mechanism can promote the advancement of cooperative performance; (3) the cooperative governance doesn’t play a role of mediating variable between the farmers’ motivation to join cooperatives and the cooperative performance. Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to further the construction and development of farmers’ professional cooperatives.

参考文献/References:

[1] HART O, MOORE J. The governance of exchanges: members’ cooperatives versus outside ownership[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1996,32(12):53-69.
[2] CHARLES LING. The nature of cooperatives[J]. Rural Cooperatives,2012,13(1): 32-35.
[3] ANDREA HARRIS. New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory[J]. Journal of Cooperatives,1996,11(6):
15-28.
[4] 陈俊梁. 创新农民专业合作社治理结构的思考[J]. 南方农村,2010(2):64-67.
[5] 唐亚,邓军蓉. 湖北省农民专业合作社治理结构现状与对策——基于23家合作社的调查[J]. 长江大学学报（自然科学版),2013,10(17):85-88.
[6] RHODES V J. The large agricultural cooperatives as a competitor[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1983,65(5):1090-1095.
[7] 黄胜忠,徐旭初. 农民专业合作社的运行机制分析[J]. 商业研究,2009(10):121-124.
[8] 赵建欣. 中国农民专业合作社存在的问题及对策分析——基于合作社快速发展的背景[J]. 中国农学通报,
2011,27(29):187-192.
[9] COOK M L. The future of U. S. Agriculture cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach[J]. American Journal of Agricu-
ltural Economics,1995,77(5): 1153-1159.
[10] FULTON M. Cooperatives and member commitment[J]. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics,1999,48(4):
418-437.
[11] 王军. 合作社治理:文献综述[J]. 中国农村观察,2010
(2):71-77.
[12] 赵谦. 专业合作社法实施中的农民参与困境及校正——以重庆为例[J]. 法学,2012(3):131-142.
[13] 孙亚范. 农民专业合作社治理中的社员参与意愿影响因素研究——基于江苏省的调查数据[J]. 经济问题,
2014(3):93-98.
[14] HAROLD DEMSETZ. Ownership, control and the firm[M]. Blackwell Publishers,1988.
[15] HANSMANN H. The ownership of enterprise[M]. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1996.
[16] FULTON,MURRAY, LOU HAMMOND KETILSON. The role of cooperatives in communities: examples from sask-
atchewan[J]. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 1992(7):
15-42.
[17] CHIBANDA M,ORTMANN G F,LYNE M C. Institutional and governance factors influencing the performance of selected small holder agricultural cooperatives in Kwa Zulu Natal[J]. Agrekon,2009,48(3):293-315.
[18] 黄胜忠,林坚,徐旭初. 农民专业合作社治理机制及其绩效实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2008(3):65-73.
[19] 徐旭初,吴彬. 治理机制对农民专业合作社绩效的影响——基于浙江省526家农民专业合作社的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2010(5):43-55.
[20] 文雷. 中国农民专业合作社治理机制与绩效[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
[21] 许晓春，孟枫平. 安徽省农民专业合作社发展影响因素分析[J]. 华东经济管理,2014,28(2):15-20.
[22] 邵科,郭红东,黄祖辉. 农民专业合作社组织结构对合作社绩效的影响——基于组织绩效的感知测量方法[J]. 农林经济管理学报,2014,13(1):41-48.
[23] 刘秀玲,朱文涛. 合作社农户入社偏好、违约风险与治理研究[J]. 农林经济管理学报,2015,14(6):560-566.
[24] 孔祥智,蒋忱忱. 成员异质性对合作社治理机制的影响分析——以四川省井研县联合水果合作社为例[J]. 农村经济,2010(9):8-11.
[25] 肖端. 不完全契约视野的农民合作社组织绩效比较及其提升策略[J]. 宏观经济研究,2016(5):128-138.
[26] 娄锋,程士国,樊启. 农民专业合作社绩效评价及绩效影响因素[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,18(2):
79-87.
[27] 张开华,张清林.农民专业合作社成长的困惑与思考[J].农业经济问题,2000(5):62-66.
[28] 刘同山,孔祥智. 治理结构如何影响农民合作社绩效?——对195个样本的SEM分析[J]. 东岳论丛,2015,
36(12):16-23.
[29] 罗朝健. 关系治理与农民专业合作社成长[J]. 中国集体经济,2015(1):20-21.
[30] 袁国玲. 提升农民专业合作社组织绩效的思考[J]. 南方农村,2016(2):48-51.
[31] 郭泉. 基于SEM 模型的农村合作社绩效影响因素分析[J]. 商业经济研究,2015(11):41-43.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2016-05-25
基金项目：中华全国供销合作总社2011年研究课题“供销合作社发展中的产权制度安排与治理研究”(201169-8)
作者简介：陈汉辉(1980-)，男，安徽财经大学工商管理学院讲师，管理学博士，研究方向为企业组织与制度。Email:C28325277@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-15