[1]陈 扬.在建工程抵押制度研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(04):74-80.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.011]
　CHEN Yang.A Research on the Mortgage of Construction Work in Process[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(04):74-80.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.011]
点击复制

在建工程抵押制度研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
74-80
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2020-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Research on the Mortgage of Construction Work in Process
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)04-0074-07
作者:
陈 扬
(中央财经大学 法学院,北京 100081)
Author(s):
CHEN Yang
(Law School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
关键词:
在建工程抵押;  抵押登记;  客体范围;  特定物;  房屋抵押登记;  权利冲突
Keywords:
mortgage of construction work in process;  mortgage registration;  object scope;  specific object;  transfer registration;  rights conflict
分类号:
D923
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.04.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
立法与学理未尽完善背景下,实践中对在建工程抵押制度的法律效力认识不一。该抵押的性质、抵押范围、竣工后未申请转为房屋抵押登记的效力、与相关权利的受偿顺位等现实困境亟待厘清。剖析预告登记说与本登记说之差异,证成在建工程抵押系本登记。对物权客体之“特定物”的理解,当前学理与立法皆不再强调物之固定形态与现实占有,而自物之经济价值角度较为宽泛地考察,故认为作为在建工程抵押客体之“在建工程”应涵括未建成部分。工程竣工后未申请转为房屋抵押登记的效果问题,自客体厘定、规范分析、情理考量角度进一步审视。民法典视域下抵押物自由转让规则的引入,一定程度上缓解了与商品房预售制度等的激烈冲突,与相关权利的受偿顺位需结合物权追及效力、登记顺序等具体分析。
Abstract:
Under the background of imperfect legislation and academic theory, the legal effect of the mortgage of construction work in process is not well understood in practice. There is a great need to clarify the fact of the nature of the mortgage, the scope of the mortgage, the legal force of not applying for conversion to housing mortgage registration after project completion, and the compensation order of the related rights, etc. Comparing the advance notice registration and the mortgage registration, the paper regards the montage of construction work in process as mortgage registration. In terms of taking real right object as “specific object”, the current theory and the legislation emphasize the economic value of the object from a broader perspective instead of thefixed form and actual possession of the object. Therefore it is thought that “construction work in process” taken as the mortgaged object should involve the uncompleted parts of the project. A further examination on the legal force of not applying for housing mortgage registration after project completion should follow the principle of object determination, normative analysis and rational consideration.The rules of free transfer of mortgaged property stipulated in The Civil Codealleviate to some extent the fierce conflict with the pre-sale system of commercial housing.The order of compensation with related rights needs to be considered with recourse efficacy of real right, registration order and so on.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈华彬.物权法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2018.
[2]黄松有.《中华人民共和国物权法》条文理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2007.
[3]李延荣.房地产法研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[4]王泽鉴.民法物权[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
[5]董学立.论“在建物”上的抵押权[J].政法论丛,2009(2):31-34.
[6]史尚宽.物权法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[7]李国强.时代变迁与物权客体的重新界定[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(1):129-130.
[8]常鹏翱.民法中的物[J].法学研究,2008(2):27-39.
[9]王明远.论碳排放权的准物权和发展权属性[J].中国法学,2010(6):92-99.
[10]陈华彬.空间建设用地使用权探微[J].法学,2015(7):21-29.
[11]崔建远.物权:规范与学说——以中国物权法的解释论为中心:上册[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011.
[12]高圣平,申晨.不动产抵押登记若干问题探讨不动产抵押登记若干问题探讨——从不动产统一登记条例出发[J].社会科学,2014(5):95-102.
[13]程啸.《房屋登记办法》中在建工程抵押权——《房屋登记办法》研讨之四[J].中国房地产,2008(7):19-23.
[14]陈思静.在建工程抵押权实现中权利冲突及解决探析[J].天津法学,2015(2):30-31.
[15]王胜明.中华人民共和国物权法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2007.
[16]胡卫.论在建工程抵押中的利益协调[J].法学论坛,2009(4):135-138.
[17]邹海林.抵押权的追及效力及其缓和——兼论《物权法》第191条的制度逻辑和修正[J].法学家,2018(1):137-140.
[18]邹海林.论《民法典各分编(草案)》“担保物权”的制度完善——以《民法典各分编(草案)》 第一编物权为分析对象[J].比较法研究,2019(2):31-51.
[19]叶金强.商品房预售中的担保及登记立法研究[J].南京大学法律评论,2004(2):208-217.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020- 03- 13
作者简介:陈 扬(1995-),女,中央财经大学法学院硕士研究生,研究方向为民商法。E-mail:2237892637@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-10