[1]丁 琳,耿紫珍,单春霞.创造力与员工创新:变革—交易型领导的协同调节效应研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,40(02):61-70.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.02.008]
　DING Lin,GENG Zi-zhen,SHAN Chun-xia.Creativity and Employee Innovation:a Study on the Synergy Moderating Effect of Transformational-Transactional Leadership[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2021,40(02):61-70.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.02.008]
点击复制

创造力与员工创新:变革—交易型领导的协同调节效应研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
61-70
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2021-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Creativity and Employee Innovation:a Study on the Synergy Moderating Effect of Transformational-Transactional Leadership
文章编号:
1008-7192(2021)02-0061-10
作者:
丁 琳; 耿紫珍; 单春霞
(西安外国语大学 商学院,陕西 西安 710128)
Author(s):
DING Lin;  GENG Zi-zhen;  SHAN Chun-xia
(Business School, Xi’an International Studies University, Xi’an 710128, China)
关键词:
创造力;  员工创新;  变革型领导;  交易型领导;  调节效应
Keywords:
creativity;  innovation;  transformational leadership;  transactional leadership;  moderating effect
分类号:
F272.91
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.02.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
创造力如何高效转化为员工创新是组织创新研究的一大挑战。依据资源基础理论,领导者的管理对资源的识别利用发挥调节作用,领导将创造力资源转化为有竞争力的创新,才能为组织带来竞争优势。变革型和交易型领导作为互补相悖的领导方式能够有效促进创造力转化为员工创新。通过对6家国有企业进行问卷调查,验证了变革型和交易型领导风格对创造力与员工创新的协同调节作用:变革型和交易型领导单独对创造力和员工创新不存在显著调节效应; 变革型与交易型领导的交互项显著正向调节创造力与员工创新。研究结果将资源基础理论的适用范围从组织和战略层面扩大至微观个体层面,证实最有效的领导是同时具有变革型和交易型两种风格的领导,并将变革-交易型领导理论与资源基础理论相结合,弥补了资源基础领域领导在资源管理活动中的作用没有得到充分探讨的不足,为管理者科学有效管理创造力与创新提供了理论启示与实践指导。
Abstract:
It is a big challenge in the organizational innovation research how to transform employee creativity into innovation efficiently. According to the resource-based view, the management of leaders plays a regulation role in the identification and utilization of resources, and therefore only if the leadership turns the creativity resource into competitive innovation would the organization be endowed with competitive advantage. Transformational-transactional leadership, complementary though paradoxical, can promote effectively the transformation of creativity to employee innovation. A questionnaire survey of 6 state-owned enterprises verifies a synergistic and moderating effect that transformational and transactional styles of leadership has on the creativity and employee innovation. The results show that 1)neither transformational leadership nor transactional leadership has any significant moderating effect alone on creativity and employee innovation; 2)it is obvious that the interaction of transformational leadership and transactional leadership has positive effect on the moderation of creativity and employee innovation. The research findings expand the application range of resource-based view from organizational and strategic level to micro-individual level, and confirm that the most effective leadership should be both transformational and transactional. The combination of transformational-transactional leadership theory with the resource-based view would make up the deficiency that the influence of leadership in resource management activity is not fully discussed in the resource-based study. The paper aims to provide finally theoretical inspiration and practical guidance for managers to manage creativity and innovation scientifically and effectively.

参考文献/References:

[1]BAER M. Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(5): 1102-1119.
[2]MAGADLEY W, BIRDI K. Two sides of the innovation coin? an empirical investigation of the relative correlates of idea generation and idea implementation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2012, 16(1): 123-167.
[3]SIRMON D G, HITT M A, IRELAND R D. Managing firm resource in dynamics environments to create value: looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292.
[4]BARNEY J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 2017(1): 99-120.
[5]PENROSE E T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1959.
[6]HANSEN M H, PERRY L T, REESE C S. A bayesian operationalization of the resource-based view[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(13):1279-1295.
[7]KRAAIJENBRINK J, SPENDER J C, GROEN A J. The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques[J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36(1): 349-372.
[8]张琳,张晓军,席酉民. 领导者如何获取资源:基于制度理论、资源基础观和领导理论的分析框架[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(4): 144-149.
[9]ROSING K, FRESE M, BAUSCH A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5): 956-974.
[10]BASS B M, AVOLIO B J, JUNG D I, et al. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(2):207-218.
[11]BASS B M, AVOLIO B J. Transformational leadership and organizaitonal culture[J]. International Journal of Public Administration, 1994,17(3):541-554.
[12]SAROOGHI H, LIBAERS D, BURKEMPER A. Examing the relationship between creativity and innovation: a meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2015, 30(5):714-731.
[13]MARCH J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
[14]JANSSEN O, VAN DE VILERT E,WEST M. The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 129-145.
[15]KERLAVAJ M, ERNE M, DYSVIK A. I get by with a little help from my supervisor: creative-idea generation, idea implementation, and perceived supervisor support[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(5): 987-1000.
[16]BLEDOW R, FRESE M, ANDERSON N, etal. A dialectic perspective on innovation: coflicting demands, mutiple pathways, and ambidexterity[J]. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2(3): 305-337.
[17]BARNEY J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120.
[18]AMABILE T. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations[C]. STAW B M, CUMMINGS L L, et al. Research in organizational behavior, Greenwich: JAI Press,1988,10(2): 123-167.
[19]WERNERFELT B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180.
[20]WRIGHT P M, MCMAHAN G C, MCWILLIAMS A. Human resource as a source of sustained competitive advantage[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1994, 5(2): 301-326.
[21]AMABILE T. Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do?[J]. California Management Review, 1997, 40(1): 39-58.
[22]MUMFORD M, GUSTAFSON S B. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103(1):27-43.
[23]WOODMAN R W, SCHOENFELDT L F. An interactionist model of creative behavior[J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1990, 24(2): 279-290.
[24]AMABILE T M. Attributions of creativity: what are the consequences? [J] Creativity Research Journal, 1995, 8(4): 423-426.
[25]DRUCKER P F. The discipline of innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(8): 95-100.
[26]理查德·吕克.管理创造力与创新[M].陈大为,姜范,译.北京: 机械工业出版社,2005.
[27]SIRMON D G, GOVE S,HITT M A. Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: the effects of resource bundling and deployement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(5): 919-935.
[28]PORTER M E. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(S2): 95-118.
[29]ALVAREZ S A,BUSENITZ L W. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory[J]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6): 755-775.
[30]GUILDFORD J P. Creativity[J]. American Psychologist, 1950,5(9): 444-454.
[31]WILLIAMSON O E. The economic institution of capitalism[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
[32]陈文晶, 时勘. 变革型领导和交易型领导的回顾与展望[J]. 管理评论,2007,19(9): 22-29,63.
[33]巴纳德·切斯特.经理人员的职能[M].王永贵,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2020.
[34]Subramaniam M, YOUNDT M A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(3): 450-463.
[35]DAWSON J F, RICHTER A W. Probing three-way interacitons in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(4): 917-926.
[36]DAFT R. Organization Theory and Design[M]. New York: West, 1983.
[37]SHIN S J, ZHOU J. Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46(6): 703-714.
[38]BASU R,GREEN S G. Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 27(6): 477-499.

相似文献/References:

[1]丁 琳,耿紫珍.领导对下属的信任与员工创造力——心理授权的中介效应 [J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,35(04):31.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.04.006]
　DING Lin,GENG Zi-zhen.Leader’s Trust in Subordinate and Employee Creativity ——The mediating effect of psychological empowerment [J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2016,35(02):31.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2016.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-07-23
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972155); 教育部人文社科青年基金项目(20XJC630001)
作者简介:丁 琳(1982-),女,西安外国语大学商学院副教授,博士,研究方向为组织领导力、创造力与创新; 耿紫珍(1984-),女,西安外国语大学商学院教授,博士,研究方向为组织创造力。E-mail:dinglin2004@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-25