[1]魏子钦,黄 熹.论朱熹理学经典诠释法——以《论语》“亲亲相隐”为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,40(04):96-100.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.04.013]
　WEI Zi-qin,HUANG Xi.On the Classical Interpretation of Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism——A case study of “tolerating and concealing between kinfolks” in The Analects of Confucius[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2021,40(04):96-100.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.04.013]
点击复制

论朱熹理学经典诠释法——以《论语》“亲亲相隐”为例()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
96-100
栏目:
文 学
出版日期:
2021-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Classical Interpretation of Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism——A case study of “tolerating and concealing between kinfolks” in The Analects of Confucius
文章编号:
1008-7192(2021)04-0096-05
作者:
魏子钦; 黄 熹
(西南政法大学 马克思主义学院,重庆 401120)
Author(s):
WEI Zi-qin;  HUANG Xi
(School of Marxism, Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
关键词:
经典诠释;  朱熹;  汉学;  宋学;  “亲亲相隐”
Keywords:
classical interpretation;  Zhu Xi;  Han Studies;  Song Studies;  tolerating and concealing between kinfolks
分类号:
B244.7
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.04.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
儒家哲学与文化自创始以来,其内部一直藏含着经典诠释的发展理路。《论语》是儒家诠释之渊薮,汉、宋学者对此曾有过诸多讨论。其中,朱熹兼采汉宋,推陈出新,有别他者。以朱子诠释《论语》“亲亲相隐”为例,试寻看朱熹经典诠释之法。朱子通过“训诂考据”与“义理”并举、“生命与文化融合的体知”的诠释法,成功地纠正了“汉宋之弊”,实现排佛辟老、挺立儒学之目的,使得“天理”“人情”的理学命题内化于先秦经典中,回向至“性与天道”理学议题处,这也使生命的学问(成己)与学问的生命(成物)贯通浃恰,彰显儒家文化生命力。
Abstract:
Since the founding, Confucian philosophy and culture have been containing ways to develop classical interpretations. The Analects of Confucius is a reservoir of Confucian interpretation that scholars in the Han and Song Dynasties debated a lot. Different from other scholars, Zhu Xi not only draws lessons from the Han and Song Dynasties and also develops the new through critical assimilation of the old. The paper tries to find out Zhu Xi’s method of classical interpretation by studying his explanation of “tolerating and concealing between kinfolks” in The Analects of Confucius. By emphasizing both textual research and argumentation simultaneously and experiencing cultural blending in life, Zhu Xi succeeds in correcting errors in interpretations of the Han and Song Dynasties. Achieving the aim to refute the teachings of Buddhism and Taoism and affirming the basic viewpoints of Confucianism, Zhu Xi internalizes the Neo-Confucianism proposition of “heavenly principles” and “human feelings” into the pre-Qin classics by returning them into the Neo-Confucianist topic “human nature and heavenly way”. The thorough integration and comprehensive understanding of the knowledge of life(achieving oneself)and the life of learning(achieving external things)would manifest the vitality of Confucian culture.

参考文献/References:

[1]侯外庐.宋明理学史:上册[M].北京:人民出版社,1997.
[2]牟宗三.中国哲学十九讲[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2016.
[3]朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[4]《十三经注疏》整理委员会整理.毛诗正义:上[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[5]杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[6]俞樾.春在堂杂文续编·卷二[M].光绪二十三年重订本(石印本).
[7]章学诚.文史通义[M].吕思勉,评.李永圻,张耕华,导读整理.上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[8]朱熹.晦庵先生朱文公文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[9]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1896.
[10]朱熹.朱子全书·论孟精义:第7册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[11]朱熹.朱子全书·四书或问:第6册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[12]蒙培元.朱熹哲学十论[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
[13]梁启超.儒家哲学[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2010.
[14]熊十力.境由心生[M].北京:红旗出版社,2015.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-06-16
作者简介:魏子钦(1996-),男,西南政法大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生,研究方向为宋明理学、经典诠释; 黄 熹(1973-),男,西南政法大学副教授,哲学博士,研究方向为中国哲学与文化。E-mail:442684716@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-25