[1]杜 骞.赋论历史考辨[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(04):91-96.
　DU Qian.A Textual Criticism on the Historical Theory of Fu[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2014,33(04):91-96.
点击复制

赋论历史考辨()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
33
期数:
2014年04期
页码:
91-96
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2014-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Textual Criticism on the Historical Theory of Fu
文章编号:
1008-7192(2014)04-0091-06
作者:
杜 骞
(亳州职业技术学院,安徽 亳州236000)
Author(s):
DU Qian
(BoZhou vocational and technical College , Bozhou 236000, China technical College , Bozhou 236000, China)
关键词:
赋; 历史; 理论; 批评
Keywords:
Fu;  history;  theory;  criticism
分类号:
I 209
文献标志码:
A?
摘要:
文体批评是中国古代文学批评的基础之一，而作为文体之一的赋学批评，因赋创作的特有体制，具有相对的独立意义。“赋者铺也，铺采摘文，体物写志也”为赋之体，“不歌而诵谓之赋”为赋之用。然深入古代赋论的历史与体系，其间隆替、交叉等复杂现象又非前引之句可以概括，所以欲明赋学体用，必先对赋的理论批评历史轨迹进行梳理。
Abstract:
The stylistic criticism is one of the basic Chinese ancient literary criticisms, among which Fu criticism is relevantly independent because of the special style of Fu creation. Fu takes the style of revealing the literary grace by elaborating dictions and expressing one’s emotions by describing things at length, and also the function that “Fu is Reciting but no singing”, When going deep into the history and system of ancient Fu theory, it is found that the complex phenomena which are alternated and intertwined can’t be explained by the aforementioned. Therefore it is necessary to comb through the evolution of Fu criticism to clarify the style and function of Fu

参考文献/References:

[1]（晋）葛洪. 西京杂记:卷二[M]. 西安:三秦出版社, 2006:61.
[2] 周勋初. 司马相如赋论质疑[J]. 文史哲, 1990(5):20-25.
[3]（西汉）司马迁. 史记:卷八十四，卷一百一十七 [M]. 西安:太白文艺出版社, 2006.
[4]（梁）萧统. 文选:卷四十[[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1977:801.
[5]（清）严可均. 全晋文:卷七十四[[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 1999:833.
[6] 郭绍虞. 照隅室古典文学论集[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2009:41
[7]（梁）刘勰. 文心雕龙:诠赋第八[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2008:15.
[8]（清）林联桂. 见星庐赋话校证[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2013:43.
[9]（明）M]. 北京:人民文学出版社, 1998.
[10] 杨明. 中国历代文论选[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社, 2007:219.
[11]（清）董诰. 全唐文:卷三百五[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1983:801.

相似文献/References:

[1]蒋贤萍.穿越历史的空间——《隐之书》的诗性智慧[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,31(03):52.
　Jiang Xian-ping. Approaching the Past ——The poetic wisdom in Possession[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2012,31(04):52.
[2]元文广.刘熙载《赋概》与《毛诗序》之关系研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,34(06):72.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2015.06.013]
[3]郑洪辉,王力.中国式现代化生态向度：理论基础、历史演进与现实回应[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,42(06):48.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2023.06.007]
　ZHENG Hong-hui,WANG Li.Ecological Dimension of the Chinese Path to Modernization: Theoretical Basis, Historical Evolution and Realistic Response[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2023,42(04):48.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2023.06.007]
[4]李玲,王位.跳出历史周期率“第二个答案”的历史道路、逻辑理路与实践进路[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,43(01):17.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2024.01.003]
　LI Ling,WANG Wei.The Historical, Logical and Practical Paths for the “Second Answer”to Leap out of Historical Cycle Rate[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2024,43(04):17.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2024.01.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2014-03-12
作者简介： 杜  骞( 1987 -) ，男，陕西渭南人，亳州职业技术学院教师，硕士，研究方向为中国古代文学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-08-18