[1]陶绍兴.马克思恩格斯共同体思想:文本耕犁、学理阐释与创造性应用[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(01):1-7,46.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.001]
　TAO Shao-xing.On Marx and Engels’ Thought of Community: Text Understanding, Theoretical Interpretation and Creative Application[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(01):1-7,46.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.001]
点击复制

马克思恩格斯共同体思想:文本耕犁、学理阐释与创造性应用()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
1-7,46
栏目:
马克思主义与思想政治教育
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Marx and Engels’ Thought of Community: Text Understanding, Theoretical Interpretation and Creative Application
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)01-0001-08
作者:
陶绍兴
(安徽商贸职业技术学院 思政部, 安徽 芜湖 241002)
Author(s):
TAO Shao-xing
(Department of Ideological and Political Education, Anhui Business College, Wuhu 241002, China)
关键词:
共同体;  人类命运共同体;  秩序观;  治理体系;  价值观;  世界意义
Keywords:
community;  a community of shared future for mankind;  a view of world order;  governance system;  values;  worldwide significance
分类号:
D81
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文本耕犁下的马克思恩格斯共同体思想具体包括作为分离的共同体的社会组织、作为政治共同体的国家及由“自然形成的共同体”到“真正的共同体”的生成,在特定语境中,还泛指“联合”与“企业”,等等。学理阐释中的马克思恩格斯共同体思想内蕴着个体不能脱离共同体的主体向度、人类社会的发展与共同体的演化正相关的时间向度和“历史向世界历史转变”的空间向度等三个向度。人类命运共同体的应然出场适逢其时,它既是解决“世界怎么了、我们怎么办”这一现实问题的中国方案,也是马克思恩格斯共同体思想中国化的迫切理论需要。作为一种崭新的世界秩序观,人类命运共同体倡导国际关系民主化,超越了西方主流国际关系理论; 作为一种新的全球治理体系,人类命运共同体为经济全球化注入了强劲动力。
Abstract:
According to text understanding, Marx and Engels’thought of community, which is extensive and profound, deals with such concepts as the social organization as a detached community, the state as a political community, the generation of“real community” from “naturally communities”, and the general reference of “combine” and “enterprise” in special context. In theoretical interpretation, the thought contains three dimensions: the subject dimension that individual is incompetent to be divorced from community, the time dimension that the community evolution is positively related to the development of human society, and the spatial dimension that the history is turning into “world history”. The vision of a community of shared future for mankind, having come out at a right time, provides a Chinese solution to tackle the realistic problem of “what is wrong with the world and what shall we do?” and also meets an urgent theoretical need for the sinicization of Marx and Engels’thought of community. As a brand-new view of world order, the initiative advocates the democracy in international relations and precedes the mainstream international relations theory in the West. As a new global governance system, it is injecting strong impetus into economic globalization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[2]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[3]尹强.“人类命运共同体”的哲学反思——第十六届《哲学分析》论坛综述[J].哲学分析,2017(12):160-166.
[4]GEORGE A,HILLERY J.Definition of community:areas of agreement[J].Rural Sociology,1955(2):20.
[5]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第30卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[6]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[7]习近平.习近平谈治国理政:第二卷[M].北京:外文出版社,2017.
[8]林德山.西方政坛乱象丛生绝非偶然[N].人民日报,2018-01-21(05).
[9]刘传春. 人类命运共同体内涵的质疑、争鸣与科学认识[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2015(11):85-90.

相似文献/References:

[1]梅晓光.论政治经济学视域下的资本主义共同体[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,40(02):1.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.02.001]
　MEI Xiao-guang.On the Capitalist Community from the Perspective of Political Economy[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2021,40(01):1.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.02.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 09- 29基金项目:安徽省教育厅思想政治理论课教研重点项目(2019SZJY130); 安徽商贸职业技术学院2017年应用研究项目(2017ZDZ05); 安徽商贸职业技术学院2018年应用研究项目(2018ZDH06)作者简介:陶绍兴(1976-),男,安徽商贸职业技术学院思政部副教授,硕士,研究方向为马克思主义哲学。E-mail:taoshaoxing8237@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-05