[1]胡 静.新中国70年“五四”研究的话语转换[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(01):8-14.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.002]
　HU Jing.The Discourse Transformation in New China’s 70-year Research on the May 4th Movement[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(01):8-14.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.002]
点击复制

新中国70年“五四”研究的话语转换()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
8-14
栏目:
马克思主义与思想政治教育
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Discourse Transformation in New China’s 70-year Research on the May 4th Movement
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)01-0008-07
作者:
胡 静
(贵州师范大学 马克思主义学院, 贵州 贵阳 550001)
Author(s):
HU Jing
(School of Marxism, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China)
关键词:
五四话语;  革命性话语;  现代性话语;  后现代性话语
Keywords:
the discourse of the May 4th movement;  the revolutionary discourse;  the modern discourse;  the post-modern discourse
分类号:
K261.1
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
五四运动的话语在时代更迭中磨砺出了三种不同的话语系统:革命性话语、现代性话语、后现代性话语。不同话语体系下的“五四形象”,彰显了不同时代的价值认同。革命性话语是五四话语的逻辑起点,为夺取政治合法性提供了社会心理基础; 现代性话语是五四话语的理性重建,接续了新启蒙运动的温和反思; 后现代性是五四话语的激进解构,以反传统的视角对五四运动进行价值颠覆,多维视野下的五四运动话语,彰显了价值表达的多元化。虽然三种话语模式共存,但并不是平行结构,革命话语作为主流话语其合理性始终贯穿于历史之中,并以革命的内在逻辑转变为现代性,为现代化准备了条件,今日之现代化正是革命之结果。三种话语的层层递进和超越,透射了五四话语在社会转型和文化变迁中的社会功能和时代价值。研究方法的多元化和研究视角的广泛化,凸显了学界权衡政治立场与学术研究关系的能力,建构了完整性、客观性并存的叙事体系,以五四运动的智慧照鉴中国特色社会主义的未来。
Abstract:
With the changing of times, the discourse of the May 4th movement has developed into three different systems: revolutionary discourse, modern discourse and post-modern discourse. In different discourse systems the “May 4th image” reflects the value identification of different times respectively. Revolutionary discourse, the logical starting point of May 4th discourse provides a social psychological basis for the legitimacy to seize political power. With a rational reconstruction, its modern discourse continues the moderate reflection of the New Enlightenment. The post-modernity of the May 4th movement’s discourse when deconstructed radically subverts the value of the May 4th movement from an anti-traditional perspective. The discourse of the May 4th movement in a multi-dimensional view highlights the diversified expressions of values. Although coexisting, the three discourse modes are not in a parallelized structure. As the mainstream discourse running through the history, the rationality of revolutionary discourse has changed into modernity depending on its inherent revolution logic, which has set the stage for the modernization and thereby, today’s modernization is the result of revolution. Progressing and surpassing one by one the three kinds of discourse have transmitted the social function and times value of the discourse of May 4th movement during the social transformation and the cultural change. The diversification of research methods and the extension of research perspectives highlight the academic circle’s ability to balance the relationship between political stance and academic research, construct a narrative system of integrity and objectivity, and mirror the future of socialism with Chinese characteristics with the wisdom of the May 4th movement.

参考文献/References:

[1] 葛笑如.论高校思想政治理论课教学改革中的话语转换——以“概论”课为例[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2014(10):47-50.
[2]陈晓明.历史,话语和主体[M].北京:社会科学出版社,1994.
[3]哈耶克.个人主义与经济秩序[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1991.
[4]微拉·施瓦支.中国的启蒙运动——知识分子与五四遗产[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1989.
[5]杨春时.现代性与中国现代性的总体构成[J].求是学刊,2003(1):44-47.
[6]郭若平.意义的赋予:时势转移与“五四”话语的演变[J].安徽史学,2008(5):33-45.
[7]胡锦涛.发扬伟大的爱国主义精神为建设有中国特色社会主义努力奋斗——在五四运动八十周年纪念大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,1999-05-04(01).
[8]杨春时.“现代性批判”的错位与虚妄[J].文艺评论,1999(1):22-24.
[9]欧阳哲生.五四运动的历史诠释[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
[10]周策纵.五四运动史[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1999.
[11]中国社会科学院近代史研究所.纪念五四运动九十周年国际学术研讨会论文集:上册[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[12]MICHAEL J D.The Postmodern Urban Condition[M].Oxford:Black Well Publishers Ltd,2000.
[13]谢立中.“后现代性”及其相关概念辨析[J].社会科学研究. 2001(5):110-114.
[14]杰姆逊.后现代主义与文化理论[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社,1986.
[15]李萍.当代中国价值问题与价值重构[M].北京:人民出版社,2014.
[16]王岳川.中国后现代话语[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2004.
[17]王治河.中国的后现代化与第二次启蒙[J].马克思主义与现实.2007(2):51-60.
[18]陈平原.作为一种思想操练的五四[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2018.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 10- 29作者简介:胡 静(1991-),女,贵州师范大学马克思主义学院博士研究生,研究方向为中国近现代史基本问题。E-mail:291838432@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-05