[1]郑丽清,李 荻.论受救助者失信行为的法律规制[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,41(04):86-92.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.012 ]
　ZHENG Li-qing,LI Di.On the Legal Regulation of the Salved's Act of Breach of Faith[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2022,41(04):86-92.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.012 ]
点击复制

论受救助者失信行为的法律规制()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
41
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
86-92
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2022-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Legal Regulation of the Salved's Act of Breach of Faith
文章编号:
1008-7192(2022)04-0086-07
作者:
郑丽清; 李 荻
(福建师范大学 法学院,福建 福州350007)
Author(s):
ZHENG Li-qing;  LI Di
(Law School of Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China)
关键词:
危难救助;  失信;  法律规制;  社会保障
Keywords:
salvage;  breach of faith;  legal regulation;  social security
分类号:
D632.1
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
自彭宇案后,“扶人被讹”引发的争议经久不衰,至今仍可得见。《民法典》第184条的颁行给予救助者更大的自由和保障,针对此问题却没有太大的缓解,救助者仍然面临救助被讹的困境。深入分析导致此类失信行为出现的原因,除了对失信人惩戒不到位之外,还与受害者经济能力低弱、缺乏充足社会保障有极大关联,据此提出对策:根据失信行为所侵犯的法益类型,以民事、行政或刑事手段矫正之并纳入征信记录; 同时,增强对陷入危难者社会保障,双管齐下。如此,通过施展多元途径,以期构建更为良好和安全的危难救助环境。
Abstract:
Since the Peng Yu case, the controversy caused by the incident of“helping people but being wronged” has lasted for a long time and still can be found today. The promulgation of Article 184 of Civil Code of the People's Republic of China renders salvors greater freedom and protection, but this problem has not been fully resolved and the salvor always falls into the predicament of being wronged after salvage. Based on in-depth analysis, the paper holds that apart from the insufficient punishment for those who break the promise, the key to the frequent occurrence of such behavior is closely related to their low economic ability and lack of adequate social security. Accordingly, it is proposed to correct them by civil, administrative or criminal means according to the types of legal interests violated by trust-breaking acts and include them in the credit investigation records and also strengthen the social security for those in distress. Besides, diversified approaches should be adopted to develop a better and safer emergency rescue environment.

参考文献/References:

[1]岳经纶,温卓毅.团结与承认:中国式慈善困局的社会政策分析[J].学术研究,2013(1):42-48.
[2]郑丽清,余煌霞.被救助者讹诈行为的法律规制途径探析[J].行政与法,2016(9):47-56.
[3]王道发.论中国式“好人法”面临的困境及其解决路径——兼论《民法总则》第184条的理解与适用[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018,36(1):120-129.
[4]杰弗里·L·哈里森.法与经济学[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
[5]张晶晶.代际交往中的“弱势感”建构与信任风险[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,19(3):37-42,146.
[6]胡象明,张丽颖.公共信任风险视角下的塔西佗效应及其后果[J].学术界,2019(12):100-107.
[7]加里·S·贝克尔.人类行为的经济分析[M].王亚宁,陈琪,译.南京:上海人民出版社,2002.
[8]胡朝阳.社会失信行为的法律规制——基于外部性内在化的法经济学分析[J].法商研究,2012(6):3-5.
[9]鲁迅.鲁迅杂文全集:下册[M].北京:北京燕山出版社,2010.
[10]应飞虎.九成真相率如何突围“扶人困局”[N].人民日报,2015-10-16(05).
[11]阎云翔.社会转型期助人被讹现象的人类学分析[J].民族学刊,2010(2):1-12,160.
[12]杨东伟,陈雪.新媒体时代“扶人”事件的舆论引导研究——以腾讯新闻报道为例[J].东南传播,2016(8):85-88.
[13]黄礼琪.扶老人被指撞人 男子自杀证清白[N].羊城晚报,2014-01-07(A12G).
[14]李叶.四川达州“3小孩扶老太被讹”续:老太属敲诈勒索[EB/OL].[2021-09-28].http://news.cntv.cn/2013/11/22/ARTI1385134515050693.shtml.
[15]王利明.建立和完善多元化的受害人救济机制[J].中国法学,2009(4):146-161.
[16]李齐云,李征宇,鲁家琛.中国社会保障制度对居民收入的再分配效应分析[J].公共财政研究,2020(1):39-51.
[17]王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研(2)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
[18]高兆明,王嘉.紧急救助中的“道德冷漠”研究[J].哲学研究,2016(11):100-107.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-12-01
基金项目:国家社会科学基金资助项目“危难救助的民法困境及其应对研究”(16BFX155)
作者简介:郑丽清(1974-),女,福建师范大学法学院副教授,博士,研究方向为民法学; 李 荻(1996-),女,福建师范大学法学院硕士,研究方向为民法学。E-mail:530664508@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-25