[1]张小号.域外规制知识产权诉讼威胁的立法研究现状与趋势[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,41(04):78-85.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.011 ]
　ZHANG Xiao-hao.A Research on Extraterritorial Legislation to Regulate the Threat of Intellectual Property Litigation: Status quo and Trends[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2022,41(04):78-85.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.011 ]
点击复制

域外规制知识产权诉讼威胁的立法研究现状与趋势()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
41
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
78-85
栏目:
法学
出版日期:
2022-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Research on Extraterritorial Legislation to Regulate the Threat of Intellectual Property Litigation: Status quo and Trends
文章编号:
1008-7192(2022)04-0078-08
作者:
张小号
(西安外国语大学 高级翻译学院,陕西 西安 710128)
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiao-hao
(School of Translation Studies, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an 710128, China)
关键词:
域外;  知识产权;  诉讼威胁;  立法规制
Keywords:
extraterritorial;  intellectual property;  threat of litigation;  legislative regulation
分类号:
D923.4
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2022.04.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
知识产权诉讼威胁(或曰侵权警告)是一把双刃剑:它是一种方便快捷且成本低廉的查明和制止侵权的方式,但恶意发送知识产权诉讼威胁,会侵犯相对人与利害关系人的正当权益、挑战交易安全、妨碍创新,由此引发的诉讼进一步加重了审判压力。由于立法对知识产权诉讼威胁直接规制的缺失,不仅无法发挥诉讼威胁的工具价值,而且导致恶意发送诉讼威胁现象频现。在认清反不正当竞争法应对知识产权诉讼威胁的不足后,以英国和澳大利亚为代表的部分英美法国家开始在知识产权法中探索有针对性的规制方案。在立法进路上,代表性国家经历了分散型立法模式的阵痛后,统一修订模式开始浮出水面; 在具体措施上,稳定的立法规制生态系统形成后,代表性国家不断出台创新性举措,取得了良好的效果。域外立法规制知识产权诉讼威胁的守正与出新,对其他国家具有直接的借鉴意义。
Abstract:
Intellectual property litigation threat(also known as“infringement warning”)is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is a convenient and cost-effective way to identify and stop IP infringement. On the other hand, the malicious IP litigation threats would infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart and interested parties, challenge the transaction security and hinder the innovation, and the litigation thus triggered would raise the pressure of trial. Due to the lack of proper legislative regulations, the instrumental value of IP litigation threats cannot be fully exerted and the malicious act of sending litigation threats becomes more and more common. Having recognized the deficiency of anti-unfair competition law in dealing with the threat of IP litigation, some Anglo-American countries, the United Kingdom and Australia being typical examples, have come to explore the targeted regulatory provisions in intellectual property laws. After experiencing the pains of the decentralized legislative mode in the legislative process, the representative countries turn to the unified modification mode. In terms of specific regulatory measures like establishing a stable legislative regulatory environment, these representative countries continue to introduce innovative measures and have achieved positive results. Keeping the right and bringing forth the new, the extraterritorial legislation to regulate the threat of IP litigation would provide direct reference to other countries.

参考文献/References:

[1]曾钰诚,刘叶生.商业领域知识产权侵权警告函发送的法律规制[J].枣庄学院学报,2016(6):104-112.
[2]余向阳,姚赛.推动多元解纷机制 彰显法治文明价值[N].人民法院报,2019-07-08(02).
[3]程德理.专利侵权警告函滥用规制研究[J].知识产权,2021(5):57-67.
[4]刘鹏.浅谈对知识产权滥用的规制[J].中国发明与专利,2015(1):93-95.
[5]高憬宏.加快矛盾纠纷多元化解机制立法[N].人民法院报,2018-12-29(05).
[6]张甲天.坚持把非诉讼纠纷解决机制挺在前面的实践路径[N].人民法院报,2019-09-12(08).
[7]张弘.我国知识产权侵权司法判例实证研究——以维权成本和侵权代价为中心[EB/OL].[2019-08-13].http://www.chinaipmagazine.com/Topics/InfoShow.asp?37-1524.html.
[8]黑小兵.知识产权纠纷多元化解决机制研究[EB/OL].[2020-08-13].https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2016/05/id/1850509.s.html.
[9]GHC Bodenhausen. Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property[M]. London: William Clowes(International)Ltd., 1968.
[10]Reckitt Benkiser UK v Home Pairfum Ltd & Ors[A].EWHC 302(Pat)(13 February 2004).
[11]孙芳华,陶鑫良:民法典中知识产权星光闪耀[N]. 中国知识产权报, 2020-06-24(01).
[12]The UK Law Commission. Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats[R]. London: Williams Lea Group, 2014.
[13]JANE L. Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights-A Concise Guide for Businesses, Innovative and Creative Individuals[M].Burlington: Gower, 2009.
[14]瞿淼.发送律师函和警告函的避险指南[EB/OL].[2020-10-02].https://www.kwm.com/cn/zh/insights/latest-thinking/safety-guidelines-for-sending-lawyer-s-letter-and-warning-letter.html.
[15]IP AUSTRALIA. Types of Patents [EB/OL]. [2021-12-20].https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/understanding-patents/types-patents.
[16]DAVID B, CLAIRE H. Intellectual Property Asset Management-How to identify, protect, manage and exploit intellectual property within the business environment [M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
[17]张小号,权彦敏.恶意知识产权诉讼威胁立法规制之最简方案——评英国《知识产权(恶意威胁)法》[J].电子知识产权,2019(2):73-80.
[18]JAMES F, et al. UK threats: worldwide consequences?[J]. European Intellectual Property Review, 2018, 40(2): 77-84.
[19]GOWLING WLG. A Review of Patent Cases in 2020[EB/OL]. [2021-09-21]. https://gowlingwlg.com/getmedia/edb3d9c5-8f05-4584-ba3a-89551dec3db4/210126-swing-and-roundabouts-a-review-of-patent-cases-in-2020.pdf.xml.
[20]GOWLING WLG. A Review of Patent Cases in 2021[EB/OL].[2022-02-28]. https://gowlingwlg.com/getmedia/e80411ad-5106-4fd3-9735-0bb613c6ed24/gowling-wlg-back-to-basics-review-of-patent-judgments-2021.pdf.xml.
[21]谢晓尧.“倾听权利的声音”:知识产权侵权警告的制度机理[J].知识产权:2017(12):38-39.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-03-24
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目“恶意知识产权侵权警告立法规制的最简方案研究”(18XJA820002); 陕西省教育厅科研计划项目“陕西与英国知识产权合作模式研究”(17JK0634)
作者简介:张小号(1980-),男,西安外国语大学高级翻译学院副教授,法学博士,研究方向为知识产权、法律翻译。E-mail:zhangxiaohao@xisu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-25