[1]柯恒宇.浅析城市更新过程中城市意象的延续——基于新疆乌鲁木齐“长桥饮马”案例分析探索[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(06):85-90.
　KE Heng-yu.A Discussion of the Continuation of City Image in the Course of Urban Renewal ——A case study of the city sculpture of “Watering the Horses at Long Bridge”in Urumuqi, Xinjiang[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2014,33(06):85-90.
点击复制

浅析城市更新过程中城市意象的延续——基于新疆乌鲁木齐“长桥饮马”案例分析探索()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
33
期数:
2014年06期
页码:
85-90
栏目:
建筑文化
出版日期:
2014-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Discussion of the Continuation of City Image in the Course of Urban Renewal ——A case study of the city sculpture of “Watering the Horses at Long Bridge”in Urumuqi, Xinjiang
文章编号:
1008-7192(2014)06-0000-06
作者:
柯恒宇
（新疆大学，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046)
Author(s):
KE Heng-yu
(Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
关键词:
城市更新; 城市意象; 记忆
Keywords:
urban renewal;  city image;  memory
分类号:
TU-87
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
每座城市都有属于自己独特的城市记忆。但在当今我国快速城市化背景下，承载城市历史的空间不断遭到改造而丧失，各种城市记忆“错位”与“遗失”使得人们对曾经熟悉的家园感到不知所措。如何保护城市意象，在大规模城市更新的趋势下同时又能延续城市文脉，引用城市更新和城市意象相关理论及研究方法，以新疆乌鲁木齐市西大桥区域“长桥饮马”为例，通过对其随历史演变的过程分析，试图用一种新的方法重新建立“长桥饮马”在人们心中的记忆。
Abstract:
The city memory is unique and distinctive in each city. However, it is under the background of accelerated urbanization in China today that the city space hosting its history has been transformed unceasingly and lost mostly, so that the malposition and the loss of city memories perplex citizens in the once familiar homeland. With the view to protecting the city image and preserving the city context in the renewal tendency of large cities, the paper discusses relevant theories and methods of city renewal and city image. Taking the city sculpture of “Watering the Horses at Long Bridge” in Urumuqi, Xinjiang as an example, it analyzes the process of historical evolution to reestablish this city memory in a new way.

参考文献/References:

[1] WISE D. Urban regeneration[J]. Construction, 1985(52): 48-52. [2] 翟斌庆,伍美琴. 城市更新理念与中国城市现状[J]. 城市规划学刊,2009(2):75-82. [3] 凯文·林奇. 城市意象[M]. 方益萍,何晓军,译. 北京:华夏出版社,2002:79.[4] 杨健,刘颖. 老建筑,迁移重建就是不保护[N]. 解放日报,2010-06-13(3). [5] 乌鲁木齐市党史地方志编纂委员会. 乌鲁木齐市志[M]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,2000:152-153.[6] 王宏杰. 发现乌鲁木齐[M]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,2007:8.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘贵文,易志勇,刘冬梅.深圳市城市更新政策变迁与制度创新[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,36(03):26.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2017.03.005]
[2]李 勤,刘怡君※,周 帆.城市更新视角下老街区绿色重构设计价值评估[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(01):23.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.004]
　LI Qin,LIU Yi-jun,ZHOU Fan.The Value Assessment of the Green Reconstruction Design of Old Blocks from the Perspective of Urban Renewal[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(06):23.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-04-24 作者简介：柯恒宇（1989-）男新疆乌鲁木齐人新疆大学建筑工程学院硕士研究生，研究方向为建筑设计及其理论。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-08-28