[1]李东若.刘勰“原道”论及其当代价值[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,38(02):70-76.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.02.011]
　LI Dong-ruo.On Liu Xie's Idea of “Yuan Dao” and It's Contemporary Value[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2019,38(02):70-76.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.02.011]
点击复制

刘勰“原道”论及其当代价值()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
70-76
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Liu Xie's Idea of “Yuan Dao” and It's Contemporary Value
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2019)02-0070-07
作者:
李东若
(南京大学 文学院,江苏 南京 210023)
Author(s):
LI Dong-ruo
(School of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)
关键词:
刘勰;  文心雕龙;  原道;  中国文论
Keywords:
Liu Xie;  Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons;  Yuan Dao;  Chinese literature theory
分类号:
I01
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.02.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对于刘勰《文心雕龙·原道》之“道”的解析历来众说纷纭、莫衷一是。借助中国传统美学运思方式的视角,刘勰“原道”论美学内涵的探析或可打开新的通途。刘勰“原道”之“道”涵括了“儒”“释”“道”等中国传统哲学思想的内涵又超越于此。“原道”之“道”是孕生于中国传统美学体系的独特理论范畴,体现了中国传统美学浑融一体、经验直观的悟察和体验世界的方式。刘勰“原道”美学观,对中国当代文艺理论建设具有重要的理论启示。
Abstract:
As for Liu Xie's idea of “Dao” in the first chapter “Yuan Dao”(the original way)of Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, the interpretations are diversified and unable to decide which is right. This paper tries to explore the aesthetic connotation of his idea from the perspective of traditional Chinese aesthetic thinking mode. Liu Xie's view of “Dao” contains Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism and other traditional Chinese philosophical ideas, and even goes beyond that. The “Dao” in “Yuan Dao” is a unique theoretical category born in the Chinese traditional aesthetic system, which embodies the way of integrating Chinese traditional aesthetics into one, perceiving and experiencing the world intuitively. Liu Xie's aesthetic view of “Yuan Dao” has important theoretical enlightenment for the construction of contemporary Chinese literary theory.

参考文献/References:

[1] 章学诚.文史通义校注[M].叶瑛,校注.北京:中华书局,1985.
[2]刘勰.文心雕龙[M].黄叔琳,注.纪昀,评.上海:上海古籍出版社,2015.
[3]戚良德.文心雕龙校注通译[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[4]刘永济.文心雕龙校释[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[5]周振甫.文心雕龙今译[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[6]赵仲邑.文心雕龙译注[M].桂林:漓江出版社,1982.
[7]陆侃如,牟世金.文心雕龙译注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1995.
[8]袁行霈.中国文学史:第二卷[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[9]范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
[10]詹锳.文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.
[11]王礼卿.文心雕龙通解[M].台北:台湾黎明文化事业股份有限公司,1986.
[12]牟世金.刘勰“原道”论管见[J].文史哲,1984(6):58.
[13]鲁迅.鲁迅全集:第9卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2005.
[14]中国文心雕龙学会.《文心雕龙》研究:第二辑[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996.
[15]张少康.文心雕龙研究[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2001.
[16]陈允锋.《文心雕龙》与《易传》之关系[J].赣州师院学报,1995(3):1-6.
[17]王万洪,唐雪,杜萍.《文心雕龙》思想渊源论[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2017.
[18]钱穆.中国文化史导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
[19]赵宪章.文艺学方法通论[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2006.
[20]李泽厚.美的历程[M].北京:文物出版社,1989.
[21]李泽厚.华夏美学[M].北京:三联书店,2008.
[22]屈雅君.变则通,通则久——“中国古代文论的现代转换”研讨会综述[J].文学评论,1997(1):46.
[23]洪子诚.中国当代文学史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 01- 16 作者简介:李东若(1986-),男,南京大学文学院博士研究生,研究方向为文艺美学。E-mail:baddongdong@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-30