[1]罗浩春.从《红楼梦魇》看张爱玲对《红楼梦》的版本论述[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,38(03):77-85.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.03.012 ]
　LUO Hao-chun.A Research on Zhang Ailing's Discussion of Versions of Dream in Red Mansions in Nightmare in the Red Chamber[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2019,38(03):77-85.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.03.012 ]
点击复制

从《红楼梦魇》看张爱玲对《红楼梦》的版本论述()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
77-85
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Research on Zhang Ailing's Discussion of Versions of Dream in Red Mansions in Nightmare in the Red Chamber
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2019)03-0077-09
作者:
罗浩春
(陕西理工大学 文学院,陕西 汉中 723001)
Author(s):
LUO Hao-chun
(School of Liberal Arts, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China)
关键词:
张爱玲;  《红楼梦魇》;  《红楼梦》;  版本
Keywords:
Zhang Ailing;  Nightmare in the Red Chamber;  Dream in Red Mansions;  version
分类号:
I01
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.03.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《红楼梦》被张爱玲称为自己“一切的源泉”,在其学术著作《红楼梦魇》中,通过对《红楼梦》各版本的仔细比较,张爱玲认为研究《红楼梦》版本不能以“本”为单位,而应以回、段、句为单位,对《红楼梦》后四十回续书的不足之处也进行了举证和批判,同时她还考证了《红楼梦》改写情节的原貌与遗稿的内容,对周汝昌所列举的十种早本结局也进行了逐一辨析。张爱玲研究《红楼梦》的方法别具一格:识小辨微,浅斟细酌; 旁征博引,独抒己见; 古今贯通,中西并用。正是这种独特的考据方法和考据思维,使她对学术界一直存在争议的问题也有了自己的见解。然不论是续书“狗尾续貂”“附骨之疽”的评价,还是《红楼梦》是创作而非自传的见解都还尚待商榷。
Abstract:
Referring Dream in Red Mansions as the source of all, Zhang Ailing carefully compare each version of the novel in her academic book Nightmare in the Red Chamber. Rather than taking different versions of the whole book as the research unit, Zhang Ailing prefer the comparative study of the chapter, the paragraph, the even the sentence. She also criticizes the shortcomings of the sequel of last forty chapters of Dream in Red Mansions with evidences, examines the original of rewritten plot and the contents of the manuscript, and analyzes the ten endings of the early versions listed by Zhou Ruchang. Zhang Ailing's research technique of Dream in Ted Mansions is unique: paying attention to every detail with carefully contemplation, expressing her own opinions while citing various authorities, employing western and Chinese knowledge with well-versed learning of ancient and modern times. It is this unique method and mind of textual research that makes her uphold her own opinions on the controversial issues in the academic world. However the commend of the sequel as an unworthy continuation to the masterpiece or the gangrene attached to the bone and the idea that Dream in Red Mansions is a literary creation rather than an autobiography are yet to be discussed.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张爱玲.红楼梦魇[M].北京:北京十月文艺出版社,2009.
[2]品启祥.《金锁记》与《红楼梦》[J].中国现代文学研究丛刊,1987(1):50-67.
[3]陈毓罴,刘世德,邓绍基.红楼梦论从[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
[4]陈维昭.红学通史[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005.
[5]周汝昌.定是红楼梦里人——张爱玲与《红楼梦[M].北京:团结出版社,2005.
[6]陶小红.张爱玲与《红楼梦》[M].北京:北京语言大学出版社,2014.
[7]胡兰成.论张爱玲[J].上海《杂志》月刊,1944(13):19-32.
[8]郭玉雯.红楼梦学——从脂砚斋到张爱玲[M].台湾:台北里仁书局,2004.
[9]水晶.张爱玲未完[M].台湾:台北大地出版社,1996.
[10]胡适.胡适红楼梦研究论述全编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988.
[11]俞平伯,顾颉刚.俞平伯和顾颉刚讨论《红楼梦》的通信[J].红楼梦学刊,1981(3):173-231.
[12]俞平伯.俞平伯说红楼梦[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1998.
[13]王湜华.红学才子俞平伯[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[14]王人恩.试论林语堂的《平心论高鹗》:下[J].社科纵横,2012(1):79-85.
[15]白云外史散花居士.后红楼梦[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1988.
[16]鲁迅.鲁迅全集:第8卷[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1957.
[17]袁世硕.研究作家与解析作品——就《红楼梦》“自传说”问题谈[J].文史哲,1991(6):78-84.
[18]陈伯海.唐诗学引论[M].上海:东方出版中心,1988.
[19]袁行霈.中国文学史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[20]曹雪芹.红楼梦[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 01- 12
作者简介:罗浩春(1993-),女,陕西理工大学文学院硕士研究生,研究方向为唐宋文学。E-mail: 1820606076@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-30