[1]鲍 博.论风险刑法视阈下的污染环境罪——起源、鉴戒与重新界定[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,39(01):86-93.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.012]
　BAO Bo.On the Offense of Environmental Pollution from the Perspective of Risk Criminal Law——Cause, warning and reconstruction[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2020,39(01):86-93.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.012]
点击复制

论风险刑法视阈下的污染环境罪——起源、鉴戒与重新界定()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
86-93
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Offense of Environmental Pollution from the Perspective of Risk Criminal Law——Cause, warning and reconstruction
文章编号:
1008-7192( 2020)01-0086-08
作者:
鲍 博
(福建师范大学 法学院,福建 福州 350117)
Author(s):
BAO Bo
(Law School, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)
关键词:
风险社会;  风险刑法;  刑法象征化;  污染环境罪;  抽象危险犯
Keywords:
risk society;  risk criminal law;  symbolization of criminal law;  offense of environment pollution;  abstract dangerous crime
分类号:
D914
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2020.01.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
环境犯罪起源于风险社会理论,以刑法进行规制会导致条文内涵的抽象化与前置化,从而成为刑罚扩张的论据。为避免刑法陷入象征化危机,法益的范围应受到限制。德国刑法对环境污染犯罪的规定罹于象征化,在国内也有类似的呼声,值得修法警惕。我国的污染环境罪经过多次修订,表现了立法者对于抗制犯罪的忧虑。但在理论上需要重构,应当坚持双重的法益关联论,且将其定性为抽象危险犯,法益的扩大化趋势需要坚持与罪刑法定原则与比例原则等刑法基本原则相统一,在立法模式上采取刑法典和附属刑法的双轨制。
Abstract:
Given the environmental criminology originates from the theory of risk society, the regulation of criminal law will lead to an abstraction and preposition of the article’s connotation and become the argument of penalty expansion. In order to avoid the symbolic crisis of criminal law, the scope of rechtsgut(legally protected interest)should be limited. This is a cautionary issue worth paying attention to in the amendment of law, for the provisions of German criminal law on environmental pollution crime are emblematic and there are similar appeals in China. After several revisions, the definition of the offense of environmental pollution in China shows legislator’s anxiety about criminal prevention and control. However it is necessary to reconstruct the theory by holding on the dual relevance theory of legal interests and defining it as abstract dangerous crime. The expansion trend of legal interest needs to be consistent with the basic principles of criminal law, such as the principle of legality and the principle of proportionality. In the legislative mode, we should adopt the dual system of both criminal law and accessory criminal law.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈伟.《刑法修正案(九)》的刑罚特点及其前置化趋势[J].净月学刊,2016(3):44-50.
[2]古承宗.刑法的象征化与规制理性[M].台北:元照出版公司,2019.
[3]李茂生.风险社会与规范论的世界[J].月旦法学杂志,2009(173):145-153.
[4]KASPER,BERND.Die Erheblichkeitsschwelle im Bereich des Umweltstrafrechts[M].Deutsch:Peter lawg Gmbh, Lnternationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften,1997.
[5]SCHWINGE,CHRISTINA. Strafrechtliche Sanktionen Gegenüber Unternehmen im Bereich des Umweltstrafrecchts [M].Deutsch: Centaurus, 1995.
[6]付立庆.中国《刑法》中的环境犯罪:梳理、评价与展望[J].法学杂志,2018,39(4):54-62.
[7]张丽卿.全球风险社会刑法新议题——以食品及医疗为中心[M].台北:元照出版公司,2015.
[8]张道许.风险社会视角下环境刑法的理论调适[J].河南警察学院学报,2019,28(3):70-77.
[9]李涛.污染环境罪属于行为犯而非结果犯[EB/OL].[2016-11-09].https://newspaper.jcrb.com/2016/20161109/20161109_003/20161109_003_4.htm.
[10]赵文龙.抽象危险犯的限缩认定研究——以醉酒型危险驾驶罪为例[J].上海公安高等专科学校学报,2019,29(2):66-73.
[11]罗梓心.风险社会语境下污染环境罪抽象危险犯之提倡[J].法制与经济,2019(5):118-120.
[12]张伟.两岸食品安全犯罪刑事立法比较研究[J].当代法学,2015,29(2):22-33.
[13]吴情树.《食品安全法》中刑事责任条款的设定——以附属刑法为研究视角[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2008,25(6):100-105.
[14]张丽卿.海峡两岸有关毒奶事件的法律关照[J].东海大学法学研究,2009(31):105-149.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019- 09- 18作者简介:鲍 博(1996-),男,福建师范大学法学院硕士研究生,研究方向为刑法学。E-mail:715738387@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-05