[1]商晓冬.斯多葛学派与儒家政治思想浅层次比较研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,32(05):7-12.
　SHANG Xiao-dong.A Comparative Study of the Political Thoughts of Stoicism and Confucianism[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2013,32(05):7-12.
点击复制

斯多葛学派与儒家政治思想浅层次比较研究()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
32
期数:
2013年05期
页码:
7-12
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2013-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study of the Political Thoughts of Stoicism and Confucianism
文章编号:
1008-7192(2013)05-0007-06
作者:
商晓冬
(华侨大学,福建 泉州 362021)
Author(s):
SHANG Xiao-dong
(Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China) 
关键词:
斯多葛学派; 儒家思想; 平等; 等级
Keywords:
stoicism; confucianism; equality; social estate
分类号:
B 12;B 222
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
斯多葛学派和儒家思想的不同影响了东西方各自文明发展的轨迹?斯多葛学派起源于理性的自然法思想,从人本的精神出发,讲求精神自由与平等主义,提倡法制与分权制衡?儒家倡导“君权神授”,提倡人治,用纲常教义?大一统观念进行束缚,确立等级观念,产生君主专制的政体?
Abstract:
Stoicism and Confucianism influence the development of Eastern and Western civilizations respectively.Originated from the rational thought of natural law,Stoicism,from the view of humanity,emphasizes the spirit of freedom and equality and advocates the rule of law and the checks and balance.On the other hand,Confucianism advocates"the divine right of kings" without rules to follow.Calling for the rule by man,the regime of autocratical monarchy was obsessed of hierarchy,which shackles the mind with a unified concept and the doctrine of moral orders.

参考文献/References:

[1](英)梅因.古代法[M].沈景一,译.北京:商务印书馆,1959:43.

[2]周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑:上[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:216.

[3]法学教材编辑部西方法律思想史编写组.西方法律思想史资料选编[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1983:66,78.

[4]GEORGIA H.The Source of Western Morality[M].New York,1954:209.

[5]ARNOLD J T.Roman stoicism[M].Cambridge,1911:270.

[6](英)罗素.西方哲学史:上[M].何兆武,李约瑟,译.北京:商务印书馆,1976:342.

[7](英)洛克.政府论:下[M].叶启芳,瞿菊农,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:5-6.

[8]王亚南.中国官僚政治研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997:78.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期 :2013-07-17
 作者简介:商晓冬(1985-),男,山东东营人,华侨大学公共管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为政治学理论?
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-10