[1]刘 志,毕琳杰.论生态损害赔偿权利人在磋商制度中的定位[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,40(03):58-64.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.03.009]
　LIU Zhi,BI Lin-jie.On the Right Holder’s Position in the Ecological Damage Compensation in Consultation System[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2021,40(03):58-64.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.03.009]
点击复制

论生态损害赔偿权利人在磋商制度中的定位()
分享到：

西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）[ISSN:1008-7192/CN:61-1330/C]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
58-64
栏目:
法 学
出版日期:
2021-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Right Holder’s Position in the Ecological Damage Compensation in Consultation System
文章编号:
1008-7192(2021)03-0058-07
作者:
刘 志; 毕琳杰
(长安大学 人文学院,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
LIU Zhi;  BI Lin-jie
(School of Humanities, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054,China)
关键词:
生态损害赔偿;  磋商制度;  赔偿权利人;  角色定位;  双阶理论
Keywords:
ecological damage compensation;  consultation system;  the right holder of compensation;  role position;  two-stage theory
分类号:
D922.68
DOI:
10.15986/j.1008-7192.2021.03.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生态损害赔偿磋商制度作为我国本土内生且有别于传统环境行政方式的新型环境治理制度创新成果,彰显公权行使特征与私法自治内涵的融合,旨在更好地实现损害赔偿、生态修复之目标。政府即赔偿权利人在磋商制度运行中既担任着行政机关管理者的身份,同时扮演着民事求偿权利人的角色,体现“行政机关+民事权利人”的双阶构造,若将赔偿权利人分别定位为纯粹的行政主体或民事主体均难以解决其在整个磋商过程中复杂的身份混同困境,应以双阶构造理论具体剖析生态损害赔偿磋商的法律性质以及赔偿权利人特殊的双重法律地位,并反思学界各派理论纷争之利弊,提出最为适宜的解释路径,为之后专门法律的出台奠定学理基础。
Abstract:
The consultation system of ecological damage compensation is a new innovation achievement of the environmental governance system in China, which is endogenous indigenously and different from the traditional environmental administrative mode. Highlighting the integration of the exercising characteristics of public power and the autonomous connotation of private law, the system aims to better achieve the goals of damage compensation and ecological restoration. The government, the right holder of compensation, not only acts as the administrator of the administrative organ, but also plays a role of the right holder of civil claim, which reflects the two-stage structure of “administrative organ + civil obligee”. If the compensation obligee is positioned merely as a simple administrative subject or a civil subject, it is difficult to solve the problem of complicated identity confusion in the whole negotiating process. It is necessary to analyze in detail the legal nature of the consultation for ecological damage compensation and the special dual legal status of the right holder of compensation in the light of the two-stage theory. We should also reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of the theoretical disputes of various academic factions and put forward the most appropriate interpretation path, so as to lay a theoretical foundation for the enactment of special laws.

参考文献/References:

[1]于淼淼.关于《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革试点方案》浅析[C]∥新形势下环境法的发展与完善——2016 年全国环境资源法学研讨会(年会)论文集.中国环境资源法学研究会,武汉大学,2016.
[2]程雨燕.生态环境损害赔偿磋商制度构想[J].北方法学,2017,11(5):81-90.
[3]周楠.罗马法原论:上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994.
[4]刘巧儿.生态环境损害“赔偿权利人”的解释论分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,12(4):13-19.
[5]潘佳.生态环境损害赔偿磋商制度解构[J].法律适用(司法案例),2019(6):114-120.
[6]严益州.德国行政法上的双阶理论[J].环球法律评论,2015,37(1):88-106.
[7]CHRISTIAN V B. Principles of European Law on Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another[M].Munich: Sellier Eropean Law Publishers,2009.
[8]刘莉,胡攀.生态环境损害赔偿磋商制度的双阶构造解释论[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2019(1):37-46.
[9]肖萍,卢群.论生态环境损害赔偿权利人的法律地位[J].江西社会科学,2019,39(6):188-195.
[10]唐绍均,杜霞,蒋云飞.论生态环境损害赔偿行政磋商协议的性质[J].理论导刊,2019(9):92-97.
[11]李兴宇.生态环境损害赔偿磋商的性质辨识与制度塑造[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(4):44-56.
[12]郭海蓝,陈德敏.生态环境损害赔偿磋商的法律性质思辨及展开[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(4):175-186.
[13]彭中遥.生态环境损害赔偿磋商性质定位省思[J].宁夏社会科学,2019(5):73-80.
[14]梅宏,胡勇.论行政机关提起生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的正当性与可行性[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2017,23(5):82-89.
[15]陈海嵩.生态环境损害赔偿制度的反思与重构——宪法解释的视角[J].东方法学,2018(6):20-27.

相似文献/References:

[1]韩翠平,李红梅.论生态环境损害赔偿中政府的角色定位[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,38(03):63.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.03.010 ]
　HAN Cui-ping,LI Hong-mei.On the Government Role in the Compensation for Ecological Environmental Damage[J].Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition),2019,38(03):63.[doi:10.15986/j.1008-7192.2019.03.010 ]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-09-30
作者简介:刘 志(1965-),女,长安大学人文学院法学教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为环境与资源保护法学; 毕琳杰(1994-),女,长安大学人文学院法学专业硕士研究生,研究方向为环境与资源保护法学。E-mail:msbiljchd@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-25